Christopher STORY his work & more

This page is a tribute to his work & will increasingly carry the full archive, as he authorised me to do before his death, LINKS may not function but will be updated where possible..

WORLD REVOLUTION AGENTUR AT EACH OTHER’S THROATS

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/04/2010

WORLD REVOLUTION AGENTUR AT EACH OTHER’S THROATS

.

WORLD REVOLUTION AGENTUR AT EACH OTHER’S THROATS THEY SHAMELESSLY SCREAM VENEMOUS HATRED IN FRONT OF THE TV CAMERAS Thursday 22 April 2010 03:00 •

UPDATE RE: ‘ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID’: You may be interested to know that even without having this (UK) report up front on the website, the links count for it at 15:38 hrs on 24th April 2010 had leapt to 8,550, and at 17:00 to 8,990 links. Compare these data with the links summaries to be found at the foot of the report [see: Archive].
• At 12:00 hrs on 25th April, the total number of links to that report had reached 9,600.
• At 07:51 hrs on 26th April, the total number of links to that report had reached 10,500.
• BEHIND THE SHUT-DOWN OF BRITISH AND EUROPEAN AIRSPACE
• THE KGB OFFICER WHO CLOSED DOWN OUR AIRSPACE
• PRECISE ‘COINCIDENTAL TIMING’ OF A NATO AIR FORCE EXERCISE HOSTED BY GERMANY
• CORRUPT KGB BACKGROUND OF THE EUROPEAN TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER
• HISTORICAL DATA ON ICELANDIC VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS
• CENTRAL BANK OF HAITI ‘REPLACES’ CENTRAL BANK OF IRAQ FOR WHITE HOUSE FINANCIAL SCAMMING PURPOSES
• AIRSPACE SHUTDOWN: A DIRECT WARNING TO THE UNITED STATES RE THE SETTLEMENTS
• SUCCESSFUL ‘TEST’ BY COVERT SOVIETS AND THEIR COVERT ‘BLACK’ GERMAN INTELLIGENCE PARTNERS
• IRAN PROVIDES CONTROLLED ‘PRETEXT’ FOR NATO OVERTURES TOWARDS RUSSIA
•THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION: TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLDUMBER: PLUS THE FOREIGN OFFICE ATHEIST
• THE INCOMING GOVERNMENT’S LEGISLATION MAY BE NULL AND VOID, LIKE ALL UNITED KINGDOM LAWS SINCE 2000
• THE FIVE-POINTED STAR CLUE TO THE FACT THAT THE BRITISH ELECTION IS A STAGED THEATRICAL DISPLAY
• OBSERVATIONS IN THE BRITISH ‘MAINSTREAM’ PRESS ON 22ND APRIL 2010
• BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY CONFIRMED AS A GERMAN ‘BLACK OPERATION
• THE BRUTAL COVERT SOVIET CONTAINMENT OF POLAND
• FRAU ANGELA MERKEL GOES EVERYWHERE IN EUROPE EXCEPT TO POLAND
• THE THREE INTELLIGENCE RACKETEERS BEHIND THE CRISIS
• THE SORDID BACKGROUND OF DR HELMUT KOHL
• CANADIAN PRIME MINSTER HARPER REPORTED TO BE ‘SPACED OUT’
NEIL BUSH IN CHARGE OF BUSH SR.’S ASSETS?
• NEIL BUSH AND THE SAVINGS AND LOAN PILLAGING OPERATION
• NOTHING’S CHANGED, OF COURSE: LOOK AT NANCY PELOSI
• NOW THEY’VE STARTED SCREAMING AT EACH OTHER IN PUBLIC
• SACKED SARKOZY ‘SPIN DOCTOR’ CONFIRMS THAT ‘IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY’
• SO WHAT WAS SARKOZY’S ‘FORMER’ SPIN DOCTOR SAYING, EXACTLY?
• DIARY OF RECENT UNSPEAKABLE BEHIND-THE-SCENES EVENTS
• THEY ARE AVOIDING THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
• GREECE AND PORTUGAL POISED TO DESTROY THE EURO
• WE WARNED THIS WOULD HAPPEN IN THE RUN-UP TO 1999: IT’S ON THE RECORD
• THE IMF’S DOUBLE-TAXATION PROPOSAL FOR BANKS
MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: ‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.
• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.
• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.
• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.
• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.
• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS: Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010] Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx): SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C. You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.
• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.
NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

INTRODUCTION In recent days, your correspondent has suffered moments of wondering whether it wouldn’t be more profitable for him to shuffle off this mortal coil in exchange, should he be so elected, for a perch in Abraham’s Bosom, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt and where serpents don’t slither, either. The thought of having to record the slitherings of these iniquitous serpents one moment longer suddenly struck him as beyond obnoxious.

However, as the former Thatcher era Cabinet Minister, Michael Heseltine, pronounced as he stalked out of the Cabinet and Downing Street into a posse of reporters and TV cameras, ‘a man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do’. So we shall slog on, exposing these rats until you can hear them squealing, like Goldman Sachs, for the rest of eternity.

So many slitherings have taken place since we last reported, that you have a rich menu of snakeish behaviour to choose from here. We’ve arranged the manifestations in no particular order, so you can start wherever you like. But if you read the text as presented, you’ll find that it all ‘connects’.

BEHIND THE SHUT-DOWN OF BRITISH AND EUROPEAN AIRSPACE On 18th April, various Labour Cabinet Ministers emerged from Number 10 Downing Street, having rarely been seen before, to utter empty platitudes for the benefit of the BBC et al. concerning the small matter of the comprehensive no-fly zone that suddenly descended upon the British Isles and northern Europe due to an erupting unpronounceable volcano in Iceland.

Their sudden ‘workmanlike’ appearance admittedly made a change to the wall-to-wall emissions of hot air emitted by the political party leaders as they competed among each other for screen space and to pontificate with contrived emphasis on every single subject under the sun except those that matter: Britain’s corrosive and wasteful membership of the corrupt European Union Collective; the catastrophic financial shambles that this Labour Government, like all its predecessors, has inflicted on the country; and the scandalous ongoing commitment of British military forces to the agentur’s internationalist agendas which have nothing whatsoever to do with the United Kingdom’s national interests (which long since have been collectivised) but everything to do, at present, with the perpetuation and consolidation of such grossly demonic activities as the criminalised American Intelligence Power’s drug-trafficking operations in Afghanistan.

Among the Ministers thus suddenly on display was the Rothschild agent and notorious Europhile, Lord Mandelson, who let slip words to the effect that ‘we can’t just do as we like (over the airport shutdowns): there are (European rules) to be abided by’. Ah, so we take our sovereign airspace control orders nowadays from the European Union Collective.

This reality gradually sank into a few brainwashed BBC talking heads when various previously unheard of Belgians, Italians and East European types started appearing at staged ‘European’ press conferences, gesticulating, wagging their fingers, and generally exhibiting traits along with their broken English so alien to the British way of doing things, that it was immediately clear that they were, like our vacuous British political leads, mouthing empty verbiage in order to convey the false impression that they were ‘doing something’ – which is to say, justifying their own extremely expensive existence financed inter alia by the scammed British taxpayer.

THE KGB OFFICER WHO CLOSED DOWN OUR AIRSPACE Then, all of a sudden, Lord Mandelcreep’s observation about ‘having to adhere to European rules’ slotted into place. For who should appear, complete with short moustache and well-brushed hair, than the KGB (FSB) officer, Siim Kallas, whose latest metamorphosis, after having ‘served’ in the preceding Barroso Commission, is as the new European Transport Commissioner.

Now this Mr Kallas has a colourfully corrupt KGB history, as will be explained below. But as soon as this KGB operative surfaced, full of bonhomie and sweet reasonableness, the true significance of Mandelson’s carelessly purposeful remark for the TV cameras became clear.

Whether the skies over Britain and Europe are open for commercial air traffic is in the gift, you see, of the covert ongoing Soviet KGB, i.e. of Soviet Military Intelligence (Glavnoye Rzvedyvatelnoye Upravleniye, or the GRU).

The process whereby the covert Soviet Union, having been deceptively ‘dismantled’ under the guidance of that supreme Leninist strategist, Mikhail Gorbachëv, who continues as before, working from a suite of offices in the Kremlin, was carefully dissected and explained for all to comprehend in the Editor’s book The European Union Collective [2002]. Gorbachëv always follows V. I. Lenin’s precise dicta, one of the more obscure of which is: ‘Separation precedes federation’.

In other words, what this episode (which completely disrupted this Editor’s schedule of course) has demonstrated is that the British authorities are so spineless, brainwashed, weak and gutless that they are prepared to push many airlines to the brink of actual bankruptcy, to cause prospectively catastrophic disruption to the mails, to inflict near-death blows on innumerable UK categories of businesses, and to risk a sharp escalation of unemployment – all for the sake of not saying boo to the sacred, pungent cow called ‘Europe’.

And what Soviet Military Intelligence has been able to confirm is that it’s not necessary to do much in order to disrupt Western European economies other than to exploit an existing natural disaster (IF that’s what the unpronounceable volcanic eruption is) in order to procure the grounding of all commercial aircraft and the associated economic and financial consequences.

And if commercial air traffic can be grounded in such a fashion, then of course the same may very well apply to military flights as well. For they were indeed grounded, too.

PRECISE ‘COINCIDENTAL TIMING’ OF A NATO AIR FORCE EXERCISE HOSTED BY GERMANY Which is NOT academic, because this episode ‘just happened’ to coincide with a NATO air force exercise, conveniently hosted by Germany, running in parallel with the crisis – namely, from 12th to the 22nd of April. It’s quite possible that the commercial airline lockdown even formed part of this exercise. Whatever the precise explanation, the coincidences here are highly suspicious. It is not necessary to recall in addition that ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) waves can be used to disturb a volcano, while scalar waves can be deployed to manipulate the weather so that the volcanic ash does not circulate according to normal patterns, to conclude that a secret test to establish with what ‘efficiency’ northern Europe’s airspace can be shut down, has been an unqualified success.

Contributing to that success will have been suitably ‘technical’ regulations developed by the corrupt European Commission specifically in anticipation of such an exercise, which has proved that the entire airspace of northern Europe can be shut down BY REGULATORY FIAT.

CORRUPT KGB BACKGROUND OF THE EUROPEAN TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER Now let’s look at the background of the European Transport Commissioner, Mr Siim Kallas.

In 1992, this KGB operative had been posted to function as Chairman of the Bank of Estonia, having previously been in charge of that state-owned bank’s administration.

In the spring of 1992, Estonia received back 11.4 tons of gold from the Bank of England. This gold, always Estonia’s property, had been shipped to London on 17th June 1940 for ‘safekeeping’, ahead of the Nazi occupation of the Baltic States. Estonia’s exiled government reached a ‘gentleman’s agreement’ with the British Government of the day, under which the gold stocks would be held for Estonia’s disposal but would only be returned to a free and independent Estonia, the British having never recognised the occupation of Estonia by the Soviets.

Indicative of the fact that the British Foreign Office assumed, in its arrogance, that ‘collapsible Communism’ was for real, rather than the Leninist strategic deception that it really was, the gold was duly handed back after 52 years and was to be used to back the new Estonian kroon.

But in 1993 under Siim Kallas, the Bank of Estonia, using the gold as collateral, secretly arranged the transfer via a third party of $10 million from the Bank to a Swiss institution, under a contract supposedly involving dividends from oil trades (1), (2).

The Bank of Estonia was not the beneficiary of income generated from the $10.0 million ‘seed money’. Nor did the anonymous beneficiaries provide any guarantees for the safe return of the alienated capital to the Bank of Estonia, and neither did they bear any of the attendant liabilities.

Of course the money vanished, along with the Fraudulent Finance income that it had generated.

As KGB and CIA officers do, Kallas ‘moved on’, into ‘politics’ in fact, founding the ‘Reform Party’, which was quickly merged into the government coalition, with Kallas being installed as Minister of Finance (since a demand from the KGB cannot be refused).

In September 1998, Siim Kallas and his adviser Urmas Kaju, went on trial for investing public money without the authority of the Council of the Bank of Estonia.

The pair were further accused of causing material loss to the people of Estonia by attempting to divert interest from the unauthorised investment. In addition, they were accused of theft, while Kallas was accused of corruptly misusing his authority. The journal Central European Review confirmed that Kallas was convicted on these charges, although the convictions were overturned on appeal. One charge of furnishing false information was referred back to lower courts; and on 30th October 2000, the four-year criminal case against Mr Kallas came to a halt when the lower court acquitted this KGB operative on the ‘minor’ outstanding charge.

A former Estonian MP and doctor of law, Mr Ando Leps, who has written extensively about this corruption, claims that Kallas was at the centre of other financial problems at the Bank of Estonia. Throughout the legal process, Kallas’ representative was Indrek Teder, law partner with Märt Rask, Justice Minister in the Estonian Government and Chairman of the Estonian Supreme Court. And by an even happier ‘coincidence’, Rask was also a member of the ‘Reform Party’, of which Kallas was the self-appointed founder and leader (3).

Other details of this scam, involving offshore accounts in Delaware, clearly implying that Kallas and friends became enmeshed in Bush Crime Family-style offshore Fraudulent Finance trading illicit operations, could be related; but enough has been said to confirm that Siim Kallas was hardly an appropriate choice for the post of European Anti-Fraud Commissioner, awarded to him by the little Portuguese EU capo, José Manuel Barroso, President of the corrupt European Commission, when assembling his first ‘Administration’.

When Barroso came to shuffle his unaccountable and generally corrupt placemen for his second Commission (each European Commission has a life-span of six years), he appointed the KGB/FSB officer, Siim Kallas, as European Transport Commissioner. Or to be more precise, it was ‘pointed out’ to Barroso that this would be the post to which Kallas should be ‘appointed’.

HISTORICAL DATA ON ICELANDIC VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS In June 1783, an Icelandic volcano named Laki erupted, opening a fissure 15 miles long, which spewed out tons of lava, dust and acidic, poisonous gases, for eight months.

Most of Iceland’s sheep and cattle died from eating contaminated grass, while some 25% of the population died of starvation or inhalation of toxic fumes. A thick, poisonous fog descended over much of Europe. The sun faded and thunderstorms proliferated in the gloom. Many people died, with a recent survey of parish records in Britain having concluded that some 11,500 additional deaths, above the norm, occurred in 1783, probably triggered by heart and lung disease.

This was, in fact, the greatest natural disaster to have occurred in Britain in recorded history, apart from epidemics, especially the plague. It is reckoned that 100,000 people would die in Britain if such an event were to occur today (5).

The preceding eruption of the Eyjafjallajokökull volcano began in 1821 and lasted well into 1823, with the ash-fall at its heaviest after six months (6).

Having followed the slitherings of the serpent for so long, we know, do we not, that no abomination is beyond the criminal kleptocracy.

Since, as indicated above, volcanic eruptions (and ‘earthquakes’) can be triggered by Extremely Low Frequency waves, the Dark Forces concerned have also, no doubt, satisfied themselves that, in addition to procuring the knee-jerk grounding of all commercial aircraft in Britain and northern Europe, a volcanic natural disaster capable of plunging Britain, part of the ‘Main Enemy’, back into the Dark Ages, ‘can always be arranged’.

CENTRAL BANK OF HAITI ‘REPLACES’ CENTRAL BANK OF IRAQ FOR WHITE HOUSE FINANCIAL SCAMMING PURPOSES Likewise, earthquakes could be arranged so as to devastate Port-au-Prince, Haiti, destroying a quarter of a million lives in the process – enabling the criminalist cadres within the US structures to seize de facto control of the Central Bank of Haiti – for corrupt ‘insider’ trading purposes. For the Central Bank of Haiti now performs the same function as the Central Bank of Iraq, which used to be the White House’s controlled ‘independent’ central bank, used for all manner of irregular, below-the-radar financial transactions via the Federal Inter Bank Settlement Fund that’s controlled by the Federal Reserve Board. But with the ‘democratic independence’ of Iraq assuming tentative, albeit of course fragile, reality, that particular corrupt game had to be wound down. So the White House needed another ‘captive’ central bank to replace the Central Bank of Iraq. The Central Bank of Haiti performs that function perfectly [see also below].

And it is certainly extraordinary that the commencement of the volcanic ash crisis and the shutdown of British and northern European airports coincided precisely with the NATO air force exercise, hosted by Germany – with flights starting to be resumed effective 20th April, coinciding with the end of the NATO air force exercise on 22nd April. In geopolitics there are no coincidences.

AIRSPACE SHUTDOWN: A DIRECT WARNING TO THE UNITED STATES RE THE SETTLEMENTS While what we state above and immediately below is accurate, there is a FURTHER DIMENSION, which is directly connected to the Settlements: see the Diary Section below for the events that preceded the shutdown, especially the seizure of the funds sent over by the Bank of England.

The airspace shutdown followed that event, and SEVERELY IMPACTED THE UNITED STATES as well as the immediately affected countries. We are informed that the airspace shutdown, achieved by ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION, represented an operation which sent a signal to the US kleptos that the Rest of the World can immediately respond to the US criminalists’ pariah behaviour (in this case, in re-seizing theSettlement funds) by closing down normal channels of transportaion and thus, by extension, any other form of communication they choose.

This is the FURTHER DIMENSION, and if you examine the timing, and at the fact that the airspace shutdown could be turned on and off by EU fiat, you’ll see that this additional dimension is clearly pertinent. Information received at 6:15 hrs UK time, 22nd April 2010.

SUCCESSFUL ‘TEST’ BY COVERT SOVIETS AND THEIR COVERT ‘BLACK’ GERMAN INTELLIGENCE PARTNERS To place the worst possible construction on all this, given that German ‘Black’ intelligence and the KGB/FSB/GRU work together, as they always have, at the highest level, we could have witnessed a manipulative operation perpetrated from within NATO with the full collaboration of covert Soviet military intelligence, to test the extent to which Western economies and military air space can be catastrophically destabilised by malicious regulation – illustrating, not least, the crass stupidity of Europhiliacs like Mandelson in accommodating the alienation of total control over British airspace to unreliable, compromised, corrupt, penetrated Soviet-style institutionalised collectivism.

The accuracy of the Editor’s 2002 analysis, The European Collective, which shows how the Soviet Union was ‘folded’ in order to facilitate the surreptitious reverse takeover of somnolent Western Europe by the covert Soviets, is daily gaining further confirmation. The latest evidence of this emerged on 19th April when it was revealed that NATO plans to ‘invite’ Russia to participate in the development and construction of a joint (i.e. collective) defence shield against ballistic missiles launched from a rogue nuclear state, such as Iran.

IRAN PROVIDES CONTROLLED ‘PRETEXT’ FOR NATO OVERTURES TOWARDS RUSSIA This initiative exploits the deliberate, controlled ‘rogue’ status of Iran, headed by a Jew, President Ahmadinejad, whose family name is Sabourjian. In Farsi, jian means ‘Jew’; and ‘sabour’ is Farsi for the Jewish prayer-shawl: so Ahmadinejad’s family name means ‘maker of the Jewish prayer-shawl’ – a reality which the intelligence operative masquerading as President of Iran openly acknowledged in 2009, in an extraordinary incident when he held up his passport open at the page displaying his family name ‘Sabourjian’, in front of TV and press photographers [confirmed by Tehran sources].

So the Iranian ‘stand-off’ is unquestionably a controlled operation – for use as an ongoing foil against which ‘Great Leaps Forward’ towards ‘One World’ control can be developed: of which the ‘enticement’ of Russia into a NATO project is just one example.

But in reality, it is the covert Soviet Union that, in conformity with Mikhail Gorbachëv’s repeated proclamation of ‘Europe from the Atlantic to Vladivostok’, is ‘backing into’ the Western structures, just as that master Leninist strategist predicted.

US policymakers, whether stupid as usual or complicit, or both of the above, have been discussing this latest ploy directly with the Soviets. The Deputy US Assistant secretary of Defense, Bradley Roberts, told a Congressional Committee all about this during the week ending 16th April. A NATO spokesman, James Apparthurai, said that US officials had been in direct talks on the subject with Moscow, and that the NATO chief, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, supports the proposal, which he was intended to unveil to NATO at a summit meeting in Siim Kallas’s home town of Talinn this week.

Of course, the fact that the NATO summit meeting takes place in Talinn, and that the European Transport Commissioner who was orchestrating the commercial airport shutdown is a secret KGB officer from Talinn, are further ‘non-coincidences’, you will readily understand.

THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION: TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLDUMBER: PLUS THE FOREIGN OFFICE ATHEIST The British General Election campaign to date has been a painful exercise in empty rhetoric fronted by controlled political puppets trying to convince an embittered and sceptical electorate that they have something worthwhile to contribute, which is not the case.

On the one hand, the discredited, always rather dirty-looking (like Paul Wolfowitz) Gordon Brown, whose stewardship of the British financial economy has been beyond disastrous, has been forced to run around the country practicing his false smile (which he has the greatest difficulty at all times in achieving) for the benefit of unimpressed hangers-on at ‘schools’nhospitals’ (all one word). To this Tweedledum is pitted Tweedledumber, this Cameron fellow – who has no message whatsoever beyond the word ‘change’ – a revolutionary slogan which deliberately and obtusely begs the basic question: change TO WHAT?

By not defining any terms at all, these empty cardboard characters imagine that they can pull the wool over the British electorate’s eyes with impunity. But the British electorate is not stupid – as a senior so-called ‘Conservative’ informed The Times (6) on 13th April.

‘It’s a phoney war right now, but that’s not because of any lack of fighting’, this fellow confided.

‘It’s because they think we’re all fakes’.

Notice that the blame for this delusion is implicitly foisted on the electorate, which ‘thinks’ ‘we are all fakes’, so that the problem the ‘Conservatives’ faced was ‘how to convince them that we’re not fakes’. Manifestly that’s impossible, not least given that the ‘Conservative’ Party, which exists to CONSERVE rather than to OVERTHROW everything, has nothing to offer beyond its ‘change’ slogan, with no definition of terms so that no-one knows what Cameron seeks to ‘change’ the country TO. Obviously, the ‘Conservatives’ don’t know, or won’t say’.

Given this vacuum at the epicenter of the ‘Conservative’ Party’s offering to the electorate, it’s hardly surprising that ‘they think we’re all fakes’, because that’s exactly what these people are.

And WHY are they fakes?

The underlying reason is that they are purporting to be concerned with issues affecting ‘ordinary people’, and to have ‘the answers’ to ‘their’ problems – whereas in reality, these cardboard fakes are marionettes dancing to diversionary tunes orchestrated by the internationalist agenda, which embraces the sterile corruption of Britain’s membership of the European Union Collective.

Has this sacred cow even been MENTIONED in the campaign by any of the three main parties?

You guessed correctly: the answer is NO*. It’s a taboo subject: and yet, as we’ve seen even with the jackboot imposition by regulation by a KGB officer masquerading as the European Transport Commissioner, the internationalist agenda is poised to destroy the British economy, to stifle all dissent – and to achieve all this simply by means of COLLECTIVIST REGULATION.

* However the televised ‘Debate’ scheduled for 22nd April is on foreign policy, so the issue has been boxed into a controlled format from which it stands little chance of further ventilation.

Complicating the charades being acted out by Tweedledum and Tweedledumber has been the emergence of the Foreign Office atheist – another straw character, namely, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, ‘Nick’ Clegg, who wants to abolish the religious basis of ancient schools, to impose a ‘mansion tax’ and to scrap the pound in favour of the failing Euro, and whose stock rose sharply after the Tweedles made relative fools of themselves with their empty pronouncements and contradictory inanities during the first TV Election ‘Debate’.

It was of course a catastrophic error of judgment for David Cameron to have agreed to these TV ‘debates’, since they provide an opportunity for the third empty vessel to impress itself upon the confused minds of the disillusioned people.

And given that the jaded electorate remains unimpressed with the Tweedles, any first-year student of politics could have told ‘Conservative’ Central Office that the effect would be liable to catapult the third ‘candidate’ into the public consciousness, given the disillusionment with the others, with disastrous consequences for the fake ‘Conservatives’. Which is precisely what has happened. And the consequences for the ‘Conservative’ Party may be terminal.

Clegg is a self-professed, left-wing atheist, married to a Spaniard, whom he met when he was an official in Brussels, seconded there from the Foreign Office – a hotbed for several generations of treachery against British interests and its survival as a nation state.

Since, as a direct consequence of Cameron’s ill-advised agreement to participate with the Liberal Democrat leader in the televised Election ‘Debates’, the outcome of this controlled UK election is likely to be a combined majority for the Liberal Democrats and the Labour Party, the prospect, at the time of writing, appeared to be that the incoming government will be by far the furthest left of any government Britain has ever been saddled with.

Moreover the ‘Conservative’ Party could be destroyed and marginalised. The Liberal Democrats will demand, as their ‘price’ for collaboration with Labour, electoral reform, namely a flaky system of proportional representation – guaranteed to ensure weak governments in perpetuity, and to keep the ‘Conservatives’ permanently out of power.

In other words, due to the stupidity of ‘Conservative’ Central Office, the United Kingdom is on the verge of lurching sharply and irretrievably to the left – in precise accordance with the Gorbachëv formula, exposed in The European Union Collective, of procuring the permanent liquidation of all parties that are not of the left

THE INCOMING GOVERNMENT’S LEGISLATION MAY BE NULL AND VOID, LIKE ALL UNITED KINGDOM LAWS SINCE 2000 Of course, as you can see from our report entitled ‘ALL UK LEGISLATION SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID’, which did indeed ‘go viral’, if the incoming Government does not deal immediately, before doing anything else, with rectification of the Letters Patent issue affecting the Hereditary Peers, all legislation passed by the new Westminster Parliament will wind up as invalid as the legislation that earlier Parliaments under Blair and Brown have squandered a decade passing since 2000.
• In this connection, some people seem to think that because challenges concerning the Letters Patent issue have been rejected by the UK High Court, the issue is dead. That indicates a degree of perversity and dim-wittedness that only inspires contempt. Such blanket assertions overlook the fact that Baroness Ashton of Upholland made the damning pronouncement that she made in the House of Lords, which is recorded in Hansard. Her statement left the position crystal clear, as anyone who re-reads our report dated 11th April 2010 on this issue can easily understand.

And if it turns out that President Barrack Obama is an illegitimate impostor (as the Editor is not an American citizen, he cannot pronounce on this subject, which is for Americans to resolve), it will likewise follow that all legislation signed into law by Obama, together with all his Executive Orders, will turn out to have been null and void, as well – enabling the institutionalised official kleptocracy to have everything ‘both ways’ (the dialectic and double-mindedness, again), since the situation can be manipulated in accordance with what Lenin called ‘the correlation of forces’.

THE FIVE-POINTED STAR CLUE TO THE FACT THAT THE BRITISH ELECTION IS A STAGED THEATRICAL DISPLAY Meanwhile observers completely omitted to notice or draw attention to a deliberate clue that the British General Election is CONTROLLED and therefore fraudulent. We refer to the fact that the door into the venue used for the first TV Election ‘Debate’ contained an aperture in the shape of a pentastar – that is to say, the five-pointed star to be seen everywhere in the revolutionary United States and everywhere in the covert revolutionary Soviet Union.

Specifically, the all TV cameras honed in on this polished ‘wooden’ door, making sure that ‘the interested’ need not have missed this ‘in-your-face’ presentation of the CLUE to what is going on. Within the pentastar aperture was a second five-pointed star which formed a glass ‘window’ into the TV venue in Manchester.

Now American observers may not be aware that in the United Kingdom, we don’t DO five-pointed stars. This geomasonic, esoteric revolutionary emblem is NOT USED IN BRITAIN AT ALL.

Yet, all of a sudden, a five-pointed star was deliberately built into the specially constructed door, with its window into the ‘New Order’ being unveiled to the gullible members of the general public in attendance, who thought they were there to hear ‘what the leaders have to say’ and to learn about their policies. Instead, they were dumb witnesses to an empty, controlled, and debilitating charade orchestrated in order to sustain the illusion of ‘democracy’ so as to delude the population into believing that the votes to be cast on 6th May are meaningful: whereas the truth is that the main British political parties are all fully signed up to the same sterile internationalist agenda.

OBSERVATIONS IN THE BRITISH ‘MAINSTREAM’ PRESS ON 22ND APRIL 2010 Camilla Cavendish writes in an op-ed. piece in The Times, page 21, subtitled: ‘When voters say they want change, they mean an end to a system which favours cheats: in banks or on benefits’:

‘Politicians and bureaucrats could not see that they had fostered a language of bureaucracy and suspicion that was alienating to people who used public services. They stuck to stubborn mantras that exam results were better, nurses angelic. People stopped believing that politicians could understand their lives or speak their language’.

‘Politicians only sensed the anger once the economic tide began to ebb. The credit crunch showed that bankers who had flaunted their wealth as evidence of their superior merit had indulged in the most childish pass-the-parcel schemes that plunged the world economy into the dark [sic]’.

‘Most bankers emerged unscathed and unrepentant, while people who had acted prudently and saved for their futures found themselves paying for the profligacy of those who had racked up enormous debts. Low interest rates benefited mortgage holders at the expense of British savers who are still watching their money shrink in accounts that banks brazenly change every month’.

‘By the time the expenses scandal broke, bringing the realisation not only of so many MPs having their noses in the trough, but just how big the trough actually was, people had stopped listening’.
• However, because the next Government will be fully signed-up to the internationalist agenda, which overrides preoccupations with domestic issues except wherever they can be moulded to accommodate the internationalist (World Revolution) remit, any expectation of ‘change’ in this crucial respect, would be unwarranted.

There will be NO CHANGE until the brainwashed UK political Establishment ceases to cow-tow to the internationalists and until the rogue elements within the UK intelligence services are cleaned out. The idolatry of Europe has to be discarded; and of this, too, there is little hope right now, as dense UK ‘business leaders’ pontificate in The Financial Times today that they ‘want a government working strongly within the European political mainstream…. It is there, and not on the fringes of Europe… where our voice must be heard’.

These deluded ‘business leaders’ regurgitate the same claptrap that has been standard ever since this Editor became active. Here are some of the delusions encased in the foregoing drivel:
• The European Union Collective is a COLLECTIVE. Decisions are taken COLLECTIVELY.
• The COLLECTIVE is indifferent to ‘voices’. No voice can be ‘heard’ in a POLITICAL COLLECTIVE, because ALL DECISIONS ARE TAKEN COLLECTIVELY, so no ‘voice’ has any standing whatsoever.
• The ancient ‘fringes’ of Europe mantra is part of the same infantile delusion. In any POLITICAL COLLECTIVE, it is neither here nor there whether one is ‘at the centre’ of the collective, or on ‘the fringes’ thereof. The geographical location of the ‘voices’, so to speak, is IRRELEVANT: see above.
• These ‘business leaders’ are content that VAT accruals should be remitted into the hands of a criminal enterprise. As we have explained, the European Commission is a criminal enterprise. Its accounts have been explicitly UNAPPROVED by the Court of Auditors for the past 14 years. The UK Serious Fraud Office has CONFIRMED that it is A CRIMINAL OFFENCE for taxpayers’ monies to be paid into the hands of a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE. Therefore, these British ‘business leaders’ are content for the VAT payments that their businesses have to pay, to be ILLEGALLY paid into the hands of a criminal enterprise, CONTRARY TO THE RULE OF LAW. If that is the case, they are accessories to the fact of their VAT payments being illegally diverted into criminal hands.
• In demanding unqualified support for the European Union Collective, these ‘business leaders’ reveal that, actually, they are de facto fellow-travelling Communists, supporters of Lenin and of the World Revolution, and that they are quite oblivious to the reality of what they are pontificating.

BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY CONFIRMED AS A GERMAN ‘BLACK OPERATION’ One more thing. The British National Party (BNP), which exploits the Union Jack (UK flag) in all its publicity, was exposed several years ago to this Editor as a covert operation run by German ‘Black’ intelligence. One key achievement of this operation has been precisely to STEAL and ERADICATE national sentiment along with the flag, so that anyone expressing views such as that Third World immigration needs to be controlled or stopped, that the integrity of the nation state is paramount and sacrosanct, and that pride in one’s country is meritorious, is in danger of being labelled (by the Great Brainwashed) as a BNP ‘fellow-traveller’.

On 18th April, it was reported that the London organiser of the BNP, Bob Bailey, is the husband of a German Embassy diplomat. He married Ms. Martina Borgfeldt in Australia in 1999 after meeting her while serving in the Royal Marines in Africa. The current Diplomatic List shows that this woman is an ‘assistant attaché’ at the German Embassy in Mayfair, Central London. Mr Bob Bailey lives in accommodation provided by the German Embassy in London.

In a damage limitation exercise, an anonymous spinning source ‘close to the German Embassy’ said that Mr Bailey had never told his wife that he was a BNP leader, and that she only found out about it when confronted by her superiors. Mr Bob Bailey is leader of the opposition grouping on Barking and Dagenham Council, which he hopes to take control of on 6th May.

As such, he holds a public position and therefore his political affiliation is manifestly in the public domain. Accirdingly, the source of this ‘spin’, presumably an operative taking orders from German intelligence, was engaged in a clumsy attempt to cover up the fact that the British National Party is indeed, as we ourselves found out several years ago, a covert confusion-building operation run by Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, its purpose being to smother genuine British national pride and to reinforce the oppression of ‘nationalism’ – which, if it were to flourish, would threaten pan-German hegemony strategy and the internationalist agenda.

THE BRUTAL COVERT SOVIET CONTAINMENT OF POLAND Turning to the Polish situation, a central European observer informed us on 19th April 2010 as follows [verbatim account]:

[Watching the TV coverage of the Kaczynzki funeral] ‘First, I sensed that Prime Minister Donald Tusk showed by his behaviour strong signs of guilt, if not a bad conscience, given that he might well be the key figure behind any coup, at least within Poland’.

‘Secondly, the only two international players who were represented were Russia and Germany (showing your analysis in ‘The European Union Collective’ one more time to be perfectly right). [Thanks to the volcanic ash story] all the other presidents and prime ministers now had a perfect excuse not to attend. The volcanic ash dimension also prevented the arrival of an unprecedented stream of Polish patriots living outside the country to Warsaw or Krakov – so that a colossal Polish political demonstration of historic proportions did not take place’.

On the contrary ‘the world saw Poland not just politically decapitated, but basically left out in the cold. No Obama, no Gordon Brown, no Sarkozy, no Berlusconi, no Zapatero, no Papandreou; and not one single representative of European Royalty, either’.

‘Yet Russian President Medvedev did arrive – by jet aircraft – thereby indicating that the Russians, unlike ‘Eurocontrol’, had no problem with the ash cloud’.

‘Accordingly, apart from Germany’s President Horst Köhler and the German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, the gathering consisted ENTIRELY of actual Communist personnel: Yanukovich and Timoshenko, from Ukraine; the Lithuanian President, Mme. Dahlia Grybauskaité, who was formerly the European Budget Commissioner and a KGB and Party operative from the overt Soviet days; President Saakashvili, MVD chief Eduard Shevardnadze’s former Interior (‘Justice’) Minister, from Georgia; President Basescu from Romania; and the former Polish Prime Minister, now President of the European Parliament, Jerzy Buzek, who managed to travel to Poland without any difficulty’.

‘And how was the scene transmitted? Why, by a huge army of international TV teams who had managed to arrive in Poland in good time, notwithstanding the airport shutdowns’.
• CORRECTION: When originally posted, we stated in error here (based on information from Austria) that President Vaclav Klaus from the Czech Republic was nowhere to be seen. We have now received a message from the Czech Republic stating that, on the contrary, President Vaclav Klaus travelled to Krakov by train and was highly critical of the absence of Western leaders and representatives. We are very happy to make this correction, and apologise to our Czech readers for the error.
• AND LISTEN TO THIS: You will see immediately below a reference to covert Stalinist Austrian State President, Heinz Fischer, who didn’t attend the funeral. Following the update about Vaclav Klaus appended immediately above, Czech sources elaborate: Reacting to Vaclav Klaus’s criticism of the non-attendance of Western leaders, the Austrian President declared:

‘I was unable to attend because our work rules forbid my driver to exceed eight hours of continuous driving. So I had to stay in Vienna’.

The State President of the Bundesrepublik Osterreich can ORDER two drivers to drive him to any destination he likes. In official limos, THERE ARE TWO SEATS IN THE FRONT, one for the driver and another in case there needs to be a driver to back him up. Pettifogging EU REGULATIONS do not YET go so far as to require only one driver to service the needs of the State President. Is this jumped up little neo-Stalinist nuts? We don’t use RIDICULE enough to cut these nonentities down to size. The duplicitous Austrian President has made a complete dumkopf of himself and has also humiliated Austria and its people by his wayward behaviour here.

FRAU ANGELA MERKEL GOES EVERYWHERE IN EUROPE EXCEPT TO POLAND Our correspondent described, in conclusion, the quite extraordinary behaviour during this same timeframe, of Angela Merkel – the erstwhile activist in the East German Communist Party, which she served as Secretary for Agitation and Propaganda in the Communist Youth Department of Karl Marx University. First of all, Merkel indicated that she was going to attend the funeral. Then, ‘due to the ash cloud’, she was ‘forced to land in southern Europe’.

Then, for some unexplained reason, she made an overnight stop as far away as Lisbon, flying on the next day from the Portuguese capital to Rome – whereupon she was driven by car from Rome to Berlin where, according to German TV, she arrived in the late afternoon of Sunday 18th April, just as the funeral was taking place in Krakov. She could have been driven from Rome to Krakov, which is a slightly shorter journey than Rome-Berlin.

As for the covert Stalinist Austrian State President, Heinz Fischer, his excuse not to attend was that his ‘election’ is due on 25th April. But since he has no competitors for the Presidency who stand the remotest chance of winning, he could perfectly well have travelled to Krakov himself without forfeiting his re-election: a car would have taken about five hours, a helicopter ride, less than two hours. No Government Minister from Austria attended at all.

The ‘spin’ which emerged, even in the British press, following the funeral of the Polish President who perished along with most of his top aides in an old Tupolev that had been refurbished in a southern Russian factory and had only been delivered back to the Poles just a few months earlier, was that this ‘accident’ had ‘brought Russia and Poland together’ in shared grief, and had given an impetus to the prospect for good old Polish-Russian Friendship. a.k.a. ‘People’s Friendship’.

In other words, the ‘accident’ that wiped out the top echelon of the Polish Government was ‘the very best thing that could possibly have happened’. As for the Western dignitaries who all too carefully absented themselves, it would seem that they didn’t intend to disturb, by their uwanted presence, this oh-so-conveniently re-established geopolitical equilibrium.

THE THREE INTELLIGENCE RACKETEERS BEHIND THE CRISIS As you will recall, we have separately proved that the three top operatives who masterminded the controlled ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union have been systematically engaged, all along, in the TWIN operation to ‘take down’ the ‘Main Enemy’ – Britain and the United States (and also the corrupted English-speaking Dominions, Canada, Australia and New Zealand).

And as we’ve repeatedly explained, since double-mindedness and the dialectic are Kings in these circles, EVERYTHING IS DUPLICATED. Bank accounts are duplicated. All scamming operations are duplicated. Companies with the same name are duplicated in many different jurisdictions around the world. ‘Contradictory’ dual operations are launched in parallel.

The dialectical method enables these operatives to speak out of both sides of their twisted mouths simultaneously. They can say one thing on Monday and do or say the exact opposite on Tuesday, with total equanimity: because their double-mindedness enables them to rationalise ‘opposites’, or what Lenin and Gorbachëv call ‘contradictions’.

Thus the 9/11 abomination involved the TWIN towers; the aborted abomination that was to have resulted in the destruction of the Republican Convention on 1st September 2008 was to have been perpetrated in the TWIN cities of Minneapolis-St Paul.

Diabolical human experimentation on TWINS is a preoccupation of those deviants serving the Darkness who engage in such grossly demonic activities.

Therefore, it comes as no surprise that the orchestrated ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union had a TWIN – the intended orchestrated ‘takedown’ of the ‘Main Enemy’: which is what we and others have been witnessing and recording.

As previously reported, the ‘former’ Soviet President Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachëv, the former President George H. W. Bush Sr., and former German Chancellor Dr Helmut Kohl are partners with the CEO of Deutsche Bank AG, Dr Josef Ackermann, in Deutsche AG, previously named Barrington Investment Group – which is used as a money laundry and chief hidey-hole for stolen and diverted funds, including funds leveraged and derived from a contract stolen from Michael C. Cottrell’s firm Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., in 2002.

This means that Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Kohl and Ackermann are financial terrorists handling stolen and diverted funds: in other words, they ‘handle stolen goods’. This is a criminal offence in every context with the single exception of the rarefied atmosphere of the intergovernmental firmament, where the Rule of Law does not apply, and the law of the jungle prevails instead.

THE SORDID BACKGROUND OF DR HELMUT KOHL Equipped with such information, the Editor decided that he didn’t know enough about Kohl, apart from his prowess in amassing gold certificates and nullifying parallel certificates held by others (as previously reported). So we did some additional research.

We discovered the following descriptions of the kind of man Dr Kohl is, published in Spectator Magazine [28th July 2001] and Le Parisien [9th July 2001]. Guess what: all this information was swamped by the 9/11 atrocities, as the dates of these reports make self-evident. Without further elaboration, therefore, they are as follows:
• Spectator Magazine (28th July, 2001): Helmut Kohl has buried many bodies in his time, and now he has buried his wife Hannelore. Earlier this month, while Dr Helmut Kohl was in Berlin, she committed suicide by taking an overdose of painkillers and sleeping tablets at their home in Ludwigshafen, on the Rhine. The way he disposed of her body was very characteristic, combining elements of mendacity, effrontery and the ability to dominate those around him. He assembled the entire German establishment for a requiem mass in a Roman Catholic cathedral for a Protestant who had committed suicide. The German media had already, almost without exception, swallowed Frau Kohl’s explanation for her death, which was that she was suffering from such an agonising allergy to light, that for the last 15 months she had only been able to leave the house under cover of darkness. Doctors have been unable, from the scant details given, to identify her illness, and she was buried without post mortem.

Some people have reported that she seemed well able to withstand daylight within the last few months. A friend of mine recently saw her going for a walk in the Grünewald forest on the edge of Berlin, and Mr. Kohl himself alluded, on the day before she died, to their forthcoming summer holiday in Austria. Only Stern magazine ventured to point out that the official account did not hang together. It remarked that a few weeks ago, when the Kohls’ son Peter married a Turkish woman, Elif Sözen, in Istanbul, Helmut Kohl attended the wedding not with Mrs. Kohl, but with his personal assistant, Juliane Weber, who started working for him in Mainz in 1964 and has long been his right-hand aide. What Mrs. Kohl thought of this we may never know. ENDS
• Laurent Valdiquié, Le Parisien (9th July 2001): Following the suicide of his wife, Helmut Kohl is now indirectly linked to a suspicious death in France. Diethelm Höner, a German millionaire friend of Helmut and Hannelore Kohl, was found dead in his villa in Cannes on 17th January. He had been the Kohls’ informal financial adviser, running the affairs of Hannelore Kohl’s charitable foundations.

The 60 year-old financier had apparently ‘fallen downstairs’ but French prosecutors are finally investigating the death. Höner was connected with the Elf scandal, in which bribes were allegedly paid by the French oil company to Helmut Kohl’s Christian Democratic Party. Höner, whose fortune ran to some £1 million [sic], had told friends that he felt threatened for several years.

He lived in Cannes in a state of permanent fear and was obsessed by security. According to a document leaked to a French paper, he knew about the diversion of large sums of money via the German intelligence services; he alleged in this document that most of the aid given by Germany to Russia had been stolen and that the Russians were using the stolen money to finance industrial espionage in computer and bio-technology. Höner also knew Dieter Holzer, a German businessman living in Monte Carlo, who is now on the run following the revelation that he took money from the bribes paid by Elf for the purchase of the Leuna oil refinery.

The French authorities are treating the death as suspicious because, according to a preliminary medical report, the position of the body was not compatible with a fall.

And the security cameras which otherwise filmed everything in his villa, were mysteriously not functioning on the night of his death. ENDS.

The fact that our investigations have revealed Helmut Josef Michael Kohl, who was born on 3rd April 1930 in Ludwigshafen am Rhein, to be a handler of stolen goods, a financial terrorist and a criminal racketeer of the first rank, sharing the proceeds of stolen and diverted funds with his racketeering partners in Deutsche AG (Barrington Investment Group), of St Gallen, Switzerland, George Bush Sr., Mikhail Gorbachëv, and Dr Josef Ackermann, CEO of Deutsche Bank, is not surprising given ‘further and better particulars’ about this operative’s financial activities.

For Kohl has been no stranger to financial scandal. In 1999, it was revealed that his CDU political grouping had received and maintained illegal funding under his leadership. Investigations by the Bundestag into the sources of illegal CDU-tagged funds, mainly stashed in Geneva bank accounts, revealed two sources. One was the sale of German tanks to Saudi Arabia (involving kickbacks), and the other was a privatisation fund operated in collusion with the late French President François Mitterrand, who sought 2,550 unused allotments in the former East Germany for Elf Aquitaine. In December 1994, the CDU Bundestag majority passed a law nullifying all rights of the then current owners of the (petrol station) allotments. In this context, over DM 300 million in illegal funds were discovered in secret Swiss bank accounts in Geneva canton.

The fraudulently acquired allotments were then privatised for Elf Aquitaine, and wound up owned by TotalFinaElf, now Total SA. Kohl maintained that Elf Aquitaine had offered and had subsequently completed a massive investment in East Germany’s chemical industry, while also taking over 2,000 petrol stations in Germany formerly owned by the East German national oil company Minol. Elf Aquitaine was found to have financed the CDU illegally under Mitterrand’s orders, in line with standard practice in the corrupt Francophone countries.

These matters appear not to have been resolved. A German-Canadian businessman, Karlheinz Schreiber, a long-term associate of Kohl’s late CSU political rival Franz Josef Strauß, is still wanted by Bavarian prosecutors on charges of fraud and corruption. Schreiber is reported to have been fighting extradition from Canada to Germany ever since the summer of 1999 (at least, this was the position in 2008). Free on bail in Canada, Herr Schreiber filed an Affidavit implicating the former Canadian Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney. On 13th November 2007, the current Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, called for a public enquiry into Schreiber’s statements.

CANADIAN PRIME MINSTER HARPER REPORTED TO BE ‘SPACED OUT’ Although what follows may not be connected, something odd is afoot in Canada, too. Last year there was firm talk of an early General Election there, but these indications have faded amid a strange conspiracy of silence involving the highest levels of the political parties, including the Liberals – now led now by Michael Ignatieff, from a Canadian family of Russian Jewish extraction, who spent a good portion of his life in Britain, becoming well known as a late-night ‘intellectual’ talking head on BBC shows and a prolific contributor of left-wing articles to The Guardian.

Then he suddenly left Britain for a post at Harvard, after which he moved back north to Canada and entered politics – rising to the highest slot in the Liberal Party.

Meanwhile, Stephen Harper appears from his television appearances to be somewhat ‘spaced out’. A Canadian correspondent writes: ‘If you watch his eyes on TV, he appears to be not all there’. As the corruption unravels, these operatives are being exposed, or worse [see 21st April].

NEIL BUSH IN CHARGE OF BUSH SR.’S ASSETS? Earlier information suggested that Mrs Barbara Bush may have taken over the management of George Bush Sr.’s colossal illicit financial interests. Since no reports about the Bush Crime Family can be taken at face value, given the Bush Sr. apparatus’s record of floating disinformation stories via controlled ‘grapevines’ (several of which were targeted at this service at earlier stages of this criminal investigation), that assertion ought to have been accompanied by a health warning.

Nevertheless, reports that Mrs Barbara Bush spent some days in hospital in March and references to Grave’s disease, were accurate, and it has been reported that Mrs Bush remains in poor health. Her condition would be consistent with the consequences of long-term exposure to electronic activity and is paralleled by the condition of Hillary Clinton, whose physical deterioration is visible to all, and whose appearance recently has been unofficially diagnosed as being consistent with Grave’s disease. Specifically, she has put on much weight, walks awkwardly and her speech is slow, with (we are told) some slurring of her words.

After eight years in the White House, such an outcome would, experts advise, be likely.

At all events, these reports have coincided with separate information to the effect that Neil Bush, who was implicated in the Savings and Loan scandals of the 1980s, has ‘descended from’ Toronto, where he had long been operating following a prolonged spell in Hong Kong whence he had been removed at the instigation of his father George Bush Sr., to get him out of the way in the aftermath of the S&L débacle, to Houston. That cannot be be ‘good news’, given this man’s background.

NEIL BUSH AND THE SAVINGS AND LOAN PILLAGING OPERATION Specifically, his stewardship as Director of Silverado Savings and Loan, Denver, was covered in ignominy. Neil Bush became a Director on Silverado’s Board in 1985, but resigned just days after George Bush Sr. was nominated as the Republican candidate for the Presidency in 1988 and three months before Silverado was compelled by regulators to establish nearly $200 million in loan loss reserves to cushion the thrift from expected losses on shaky (i.e., shady) deals. At the time, Neil Bush said that he had resigned for personal reasons. But the real reason for his resignation was to ‘spare his father the embarrassment’ of Silverado Savings and Loan’s deteriorating condition and probable collapse (which duly occurred late in 1988).

After all, as Vice President, Bush Sr. had chaired the Bush Task Group on Regulation of Financial Services, an element of Reagan’s deregulation initiative. This operation ostenstibly disappeared into oblivion in August 1983 after the media thought it had achieved very little.

But in reality, George Bush Sr. and his corrupt associates had exploited the Task Force’s access to inside information to decipher how the financial system worked, so that it could be ransacked all the more efficiently. Typically picking up quite the wrong end of the stick, a ‘regulatory expert’ at Carnegie-Mellon University, Lester Lave, told a Fortune magazine reporter that ‘they took a lesson from the Vietnam War: Declare victory and pull out’.

No, they ‘pulled out’ because their ‘investigation’ had achieved its real purpose: to equip the Bush Crime Family with the inside knowledge it needed to orchestrate wholesale frontal attacks on the financial sector and all who invested in it.

Later, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) actually announced that it had requested the Justice Department to investigate charges that Stuart Root, the former President of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC), had given the Denver-based Silverado Savings an advance warning that regulators were intending to seize that thrift in December 1988. Silverado Savings had been borrowing heavily from the Topeka Federal Home Loan Bank, but no supervisory measures were taken against Silverado until it was finally declared insolvent in December 1988, following Bush Sr.’s election to the Presidency.

The National Thrift News reported separately that Neil Bush’s oil and gas company had a line of credit at a bank owned by a developer who owned large amounts of Silverado’s preferred stock and received more than $40 million in loans from Silverado Savings and Loan. Neil Bush also sat on the Board of a Florida corporation that borrowed over $80 million from Western Savings of Dallas, which also collapsed. In other words, Neil Bush presided over operations to divert funds from the banks on the Boards of which he sat – a state of affairs which not even his brazen father could tolerate blowing up in his face just as he was embarking upon his corrupt Presidency.

NOTHING’S CHANGED, OF COURSE: LOOK AT NANCY PELOSI The whole point about the United States is that since it is a ‘Black’ foundation – which is to say, it is rooted in geomasonic esoteric magick make-believe and gobbldegook, as the notorious layout of Washington, DC, with its phallic monument and pentastar pathways, constantly remind us.

(The same can be stated about the Vatican, which has its own phallic monument in the centre of a circle: and look what’s happening to the Vatican).

Hence nothing can ever go right in this country. Its foundation is malevolent, so everything always goes wrong. (Other countries, including Britain, of course, suffer similar problems due to their own comparable blind stupidity). Ever since the Editor of this service started visiting the United States frequently in 1977, there has been at least one major scandal ‘rocking’ Washington.

After 33 years of observing these routine eruptions of pure evil, the corrupt sewage floating downstream from Washington these days has lost its stench for veteran observers such as your correspondent. Since the root cause of these incessant manifestations of corruption isn’t either understood or tackled, they continue. Of the manifestations of the evil for which Washington is notorious, the most egregious is the continued existence of a corrupted Intelligence Power which has usurped the Executive and Legislative Branches and operates as an arrogant, murderous self-financing ‘state within the state’ without any meaningful checks and balances.

But from the perspective of the corrupted ‘elevated personages’ living and having their being within the Beltway, the status quo cannot be faulted. Take, for instance, the case of the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi. A list of her investment holdings with her husband as joint tenants in common with regard to the god they worship, Mammon, is given at Note (7).

This list provides an insight into the values of such operatives, who are supposed, when surfaced as legislators, to be impartial servants of the people.

NOW THEY’VE STARTED SCREAMING AT EACH OTHER IN PUBLIC Because it’s always ABOUT THE MONEY. At this level, there’s never any other issue. Nor can the seething anger and resentment of the holders of supreme power be hidden from public view any longer, it seems. This became clear when ‘mainstream’ media reports published on 14th April 2010 showed an unprecedented photograph of two highest-level leaders screaming at each other.

The occasion was the Nuclear Security Summit Meeting held in Washington on 13th April. On page 16 of The Daily Telegraph, the Russian (KGB) President, Dmitry Medvedev (Menakhem Aaronovich Mendel’) was seen angrily pointing his finger at French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who was angrily pointing at Medvedev, with a look of extreme hatred on his unprepossessing countenance.

The accompanying article stated blandly that ‘Nicolas Sarkozy, the French President, and Dmitry Medvedev, his Russian counterpart, appeared to have a heated exchange during the summit meetings yesterday. Mr Sarkozy has said France will not give up its nuclear weapons because doing so would ‘jeopardise’ its security. Mr Medvedev last week signed an agreement with US President Barack Obama agreeing to reduce his nuclear warheads by a third’.

It was a kindly lady at S. Japhet and Co. in the City of London, where the Editor, in 1959, was rather temporarily employed during the Eichmann controversy, who uttered an unforgettable response to your correspondent’s naïve question: ‘What’s all the fuss about? Eichmann’s Jewish’.

‘You don’t understand’, she explained patiently to the only goy on the premises: ‘A Jew’s greatest enemy is another Jew’.

The Jew in charge of France is shown screaming at the Jew in charge of Russia at a so-called Nuclear Security Summit Meeting in front of the world’s TV cameras: and The Daily Telegraph sticks this story and picture on page 16.

If your correspondent had been Editor of the newspaper, he would have ordered the front page to be cleared and the report rewritten to focus specifically on this evil exchange of mutual loathing.
• But of course, we’ve forgotten something: an intelligence cell is resident in every US and UK press room, as previously confirmed. It would have argued for the bland treatment that the British newspaper duly applied to this sensational story

Because although the context was the nuclear ‘Summit’, the underlying tension CONCERNS THE MONEY. These operatives have ‘lost it’. As we have stated, at the intergovernmental level, the Rule of Law does not exist. Everyone double-crosses everyone else, everyone lies, everyone engages in wall-to-wall intrigue, and all displays of harmony for the benefit of public consumption are false. Now we see that these ‘Dark Actors Playing Games’ cannot even hide the fact that they hate each other’s guts: and it’s neither here nor there whether a competing snake is Jewish or not.

SACKED SARKOZY ‘SPIN DOCTOR’ CONFIRMS THAT ‘IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY’ That ‘it’s all about the money’ was, moreover, a fact of life that will indeed have been at the very forefront of Mr Sarkozy’s mind even as he was engaged in this open display of fury at Medvedev for the benefit of the TV cameras. Here’s why.

It had been reported on 13th April that Mr Sarkozy had banned his chief ‘spin doctor’, M. Pierre Charon, from key meetings after his disastrous handling of the uncontrolled rumours about the state of the French President’s marriage. Like Silvio Berlusconi and Gordon Brown, the woman placed at Mr Nicolas Sarkozy’s side is believed to be an intelligence operative (another prominent example being Rupert Murdoch, whose Chinese ‘replacement’ wife is known to be a Communist Chinese intelligence agent). That way, pillow talk gets delivered instantaneously to the intelligence eavesdroppers controlling the President, Prime Minister, or senior executive in question.

Carla Bruni-Sarkozy is the French President’s third wife, and she’s said to be ‘in a relationship’ with Benjamin Biolay, ‘a musician’. For his part, President Sarkozy was reported to be having an affair with the ‘Ecology Minister’, Chantal Jouannou. All concerned have denied these suggestions, but M. Charon had different ideas. A few days earlier, he responded by claiming that President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to exclude him from key high-level meetings might have reflected a foreign plot from ‘financial movements’ intended to discredit the French President (8).

Once again, the British newspaper missed this clue, proving that it has all along had NO CLUE about THE MONEY. There is NO WAY that M. Charon, privy to French Presidential secrets, would have made such a comment without knowing what he was talking about – not least because no-one unaware of the crisis over the money would have had any reason to make such a public comment.

Besides, President Sarkozy had made it clear on his arrival earlier in the United States that he would stay there until the Settlements payouts had been completed. He was also on record as having called Obama ‘INSANE’ – another outburst DIRECTLY CONNECTED WITH THE MONEY

SO WHAT WAS SARKOZY’S ‘FORMER’ SPIN DOCTOR SAYING, EXACTLY? For the answer to this question, we need to assemble the available information on what has been going on behind the scenes as the criminal operatives in the United States continue to defy the international community – and also powerful elements within the US structures themselves.

DIARY OF RECENT UNSPEAKABLE BEHIND-THE-SCENES EVENTS To make some sense of what has been happening, we revert to our Diary Format:
• 30 March: On the Editor’s return from New York, he is informed that ‘President Obama’ has been demanding 60% of ‘the funds’, rather than 40%. According to our sources, Mr Obama was saying essentially: ‘Pay me 60%; or you’ll get nothing’, and that Swiss authorities had refused to comply.

The only figure that we can relate to here is that tax of 35% is the figure that has always been mentioned as being the tax level payable on projected Dollar Refunding proceeds. When we enquired whether these numbers referred to tax payable or some kind of payoff, the answer we managed to extract was: “Don’t know’. Separately, we are told that Bush Sr., Carlyle (and Soros) expected to receive an aggregate $1.3 trillion – apparently in US Treasury instruments.

There is no way that such data can be verified. However what is made clear to us is that the rats were continuing to fight over splitting the money (the tax component which ‘can’t be booked’).
• 02 April: ‘President’ Barack Obama attended at Bank of America’s base in Charlotte, NC, where he signed the necessary pay orders and reportedly told the Bank(s) that they must pay and put up with the consequences. He reportedly told the CIA’s primary bank that the money they had held for the Settlements payouts and which they had instead seized and used for illicit below-the-radar trading operations, must be disgorged forthwith so that the Settlements could be effected.

(Don’t get confused: recall these people say one thing on Monday, and the opposite on Tuesday).
• 03 April: It was reported to us that Mr Paul Volcker and Timothy Geithner had held a meeting in the course of which Mr Volcker had impressed upon Mr Geithner that his best course would be to ‘allow’ the Settlements payouts and the $6.2 trillion Line Item plus the Queen’s stolen gold issue to be resolved, on the basis that the consequences would be beneficial.

Mr Geithner says for the record that meetings over the next three months would be ‘critical’ steps towards bringing about policy changes procuring a more balanced global economy. As you can see, this statement meant nothing as it stood: but reading behind the empty rhetoric, what was being said was that ‘we are in an extreme situation and we are still hoping something will turn up within three months that will ease us out of the predicament (of our own making) we find ourselves in’.
• 03 April: Citibank issues instructions restricting all withdrawals during the coming (post-Easter) week. Note: Citibank appears to be the only one of the large money center banks facing this crisis that is using its institutional brain. It is downsizing as fast as it can, with minimal explanation.
• 07 April: Former President Clinton (who, like his CIA wife, looks ill these days) was rebuffed when he surfaced during the review period in Saudi Arabia, asking for money. He met King Abdullah, the Saudi intelligence chief Prince Muqrin bin Abdulaziz, the Assistant Minister of Defence, Khaled bin Sultan, and other top Saudi officials at the King’s ranch outside Riyadh, where, according to the Saudi Press Agency (SPA), they discussed ‘issues of mutual concern’.
• 08 April: Geithner stops off in Hong Kong to meet officials including the Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang and the Financial Secretary who has the same name, John Tsang. No information was released for public consumption on what was discussed.
• 08 April: Timothy Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary (accompanied according to unconfirmed reports by his predecessor, Henry M. Paulson), were likewise rebuffed when they surfaced for a 75-minute meeting in the VIP area at Beijing Airport with the Chinese Vice Premier Wang Quishan on a similar pecuniary quest – the object of the exercise being to try to rustle up enough real money to meet the hideously pressing obligations which are being forced upon the Treasury and the White House by the Lien Holders and the international community. Associated Press failed to explain why Geithner had needed to rush to Beijing, and neither did it explain what he had been doing earlier stopping off in India (trying to collect funds, of course).

The US Treasury said in a statement that Geithner and Wang Qishan ‘exchanged views on US-China economic relations, the global economic situation and on certain issues relating to’ a forthcoming meeting scheduled for May of US and Chinese officials in Beijing.
• 08 April: The former US Treasury Secretary, John Snow, now Chairman of the Cerberus vulture fund advised by Bush Sr. Vice President Dan Quayle, visiting Shanghai accompanied by former US President George W. Bush, gave an interview in which he made some vacuous comments about Chinese currency policy. What were Snow and Bush Jr. doing in Shanghai? Trying to collect funds.
• Or else the opposite: placing restolen funds.
• 09 April: Although Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., earlier submitted the requisite form as specified by the Pennsylvania authorities with his cheque for $70.00 in payment of the necessary filing fee, the reprobate Pennsylvania Department State Corporation Bureau did not enter the necessary correction. This correction entailed the designation of Michael Cottrell in four separate entries as President, CEO, Treasurer and Secretary; and the Corporation Bureau form, provided for the purpose, enabled precisely that data to be submitted in the required format along with the fee.

Instead of performing their duty having banked the $70.00 cheque, the PA Corporation Bureau deliberately and, with malicious intent – as we have caught them out having illegally inserted the Mafioso Salvatore R DeFrancesco as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. – posted the following provocative ‘in-your-face’ gibberish on the Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. screen:

Name: NONE NONE Title: Secretary Address: [Address Not Available].

This is a deliberate provocation, calculated to procure the following:
• First, to obfuscate the situation further.
• Secondly, to antagonise Mr Cottrell and all trying to assist him
• Thirdly, to CONTINUE to mask the possibility that the Mafioso Salvatore R. De Francesco retains secret illegal and corrupt signatory power as fraudulent Secretary over Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., sufficient to permit the theft of the payments due to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., in direct collaboration with the Governor of Pennsylvania and the White House.
• This scandalous state of affairs remained UNCHANGED as of 21st April 2010.
• 09 April 2010: The Bank of England holds an emergency meeting at 10.00 p.m. British time, concerning the disposition of the Settlement payments. At this crucial meeting, all outstanding issues, based on ‘assurances’ from the complicit US authorities, were supposedly ‘resolved’ – including, we were led to believe, pertinent issues surrounding the return of The Queen’s gold.

Since we were informed that ALL outstanding issues were resolved (whatever that meant in detail), it is deduced from this information that the matter of at least The Queen’s Lien on the US Treasury and the return of her $6.2 trillion LOAN pro bono publico for the private sector Dollar Refunding operation were ‘resolved’ along with the return of the gold (9).
• 09 or 10 April: The relevant funds, collected from outside the United States, and sent over via the Bank of England were delivered to US banking sector recipients, and deposited.
• 09 April: The Wall Street Journal reports:

‘In one of those rare moments of unity, the National Bank of Poland and the Polish Government agreed on the need to weaken to polish zloty, which over recent weeks has rebounded close to its pre-crisis strength… After several verbal interventions over the past few days, the central bank intervened with real money Friday, for the first time in over a decade’.
• 10 April: having placed the interests of Poland over that of the European Union Collective by stating publicly that it was ‘technologically and psychologically’ prepared to enter the currency market to prevent ‘excessive strengthening of the zloty’, the President of Poland, Franciszek Gagor, the Deputy Foreign Minister Andrzej Kremer, and the President of the National Bank of Poland, Slawomir Skrzypek, together with the other top officials including the Intelligence Chief and the Army, Navy and Air force Chiefs [see our report dated 11th April 2010] are slaughtered in the ‘accident’ near Smolensk Airport. There are unconfirmed reports of shootings having taken place while the aircraft was still in the air, and after the crash (in particular, the cold-blooded shooting of a video photographer who captured the catastrophe digitally). [See 21 April, below].
• 10-11 April: The delivered funds sent over via the Bank of England were seized by the US banks with the full participation of the White House, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency and the National Security Council. The funds were placed into ‘lockdown’.
• 12 April: Contrary to previous assurances, Mr Obama let it be known to London that ‘we have things to do and we’re not going to release the funds’. In response, London told the White House that this was unacceptable, and that the hijacked releases and the return of the $6.2 trillion and The Queen’s gold had to be done immediately.
• 12-13 April: Bank of America (Wachovia and Wells Fargo) point blank refuse to release the funds.

As has been hinted by bankers in the past, they now said outright that if they released the funds, they would collapse. In other words, Bank of America, the CIA’s primary institution, employed for its ‘Black Operations’ financial transactions (especially via its Vienna, Austria, and Swiss branches), reneged on the understandings on the basis of which the Bank of England transferred the payout funds [see above]. [FINRA is STILL allowing Wachovia to run trading programs out of St Louis, MO].
• 13 April: The heated exchanges of hatred between Medvedev and Sarkozy in front of the world’s TV cameras [see above] take place against the background of an essentially fraudulent ‘collective nuclear accord’ ostensibly reached at the Washington Nuclear Security Summit requiring extremely expensive outlays by participating governments despite the plain fact that the colossal necessary funding for decommissioning of nuclear operations was not forthcoming.

Indeed experts say that the agreement reached was so bizarre as to suggest that participants had been promised ‘financial incentives’ to reach the ‘required’ collective accord.

Our informants on this score suggested, again, that funds may have been diverted from the Settlements pot, for this purpose. We did say that the ferocious outburst of unfettered anger between Messrs Medvedev and Sarkozy was ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. Specifically, the Nuclear Accord, signed by 49 countries, appears to have been reached with the use of money diverted from the Settlement funds. Indeed, Biden and Obama were said to be engaged in ‘deal making’ behind the scenes, using stolen funds (nuclear and financial terrorism).

In other words, these operatives’ behaviour is identical to the behaviour of the Bush Crime Family, Cheney and the Clintons (all operatives).
• In any case, there was something else that was ‘not right’ about the Nuclear Summit. Specifically, Nursultan Nazarbayev, the former Communist Party Boss in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, now a bosom pal of George W. Bush, is sitting on 14% of the world’s uranium reserves, which he is selling all over the place like hot cakes. With the proceeds of these sales and also with his energy income, Nazarbayev is engaged in the construction of a monstrous geomasonic, esoteric capital city in the north of Kazakhstan, now called Astana, which is an anagram of the Russian for Satan, satana. This city, extensively designed by the agnostic British architect, Sir Norman Foster, has a huge pyramid which implements the fabrications and tripe published by the notorious dead mason Manly P. Hall and the dead 19th century masonic necromaniac, Albert Pike. A detailed article on this nauseating extravaganza is to be published in the forthcoming issue of Soviet Analyst [Volume 31, Numbers 6 & 7]. For further background, see the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order.
• 13 April: Michele Obama, accompanied by Mrs Hillary Clinton, surfaces in Haiti – where the White House now controls the Central Bank, in lieu of its waning control over the Central Bank of Iraq [see above]. Michelle Obama then disappeared and surfaced in Mexico.

The only possible explanation for these sudden visitations is that she was engaged in placing diverted/stolen funds. Given 24/7 surveillance of corrupt financial transactions, these operations have to be done by these criminal operatives in person: which explains why so many of them have been running so frenetically around the world, as described herein.
• 14 April: The former Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Fleming Herman Van Rompuy, elevated above his pay-grade as the first President of Europe (in a backroom deal between France and Germany to keep the former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, out), states that 2009 quote ‘was the first year of World Government’ unquote. This little globalist ideologue evidently believes that World Government is a ‘good thing’, forgetting that it will become a hideous dictatorship. If you have a dispute with the World Government, who do you appeal to, the Man in the Moon?
• But the real significance of this statement is as follows. In order for ‘progress’ towards ‘World Government’ (Lenin’s project) to ‘materialise’, it is necessary to have blackmailable criminalist operatives positioned in the highest slots in all the main countries of the world. 2009 was also the first year of Obama’s White House tenure, which may well prove to be spurious: in which case, all legislation that Obama signs into law will be NULL AND VOID [compare this situation with the fact that all British legislation passed since 2000 is likewise VOID: report dated 11th April [Archive]].
• So what Mr Van Rompuy was actually saying was that he welcomed the fact that the controllers of the World Revolution have successfully procured that all the top slots in the key Governments are held by criminalist operatives, or are held by blackmailable figures answerable to such forces.
• 14 April: Vice President Biden told ‘inside’ contacts and others specifically that those concerned had to be ‘in place at the banks’ because the payments would now be completed. These and other repeated high-level assurances all turned out to be lies.
• 09-14 April: Amid all this turmoil, we gathered additionally from reliable sources that:
• GRU Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov) was refusing to speak to ‘President’ Barack Obama.
• President Sarkozy’s fury wasn’t just confined to the episode at the Washington Nuclear Summit Meeting that was caught on-camera.
• When approached to disgorge some of the funny money stashed in Warsaw following the George W. Bush-era Fraudulent Finance trading fest, the Polish Government, subsequently decimated in the Tupolev air ‘accident’, had responded to the White House and the International Monetary Fund with a form of words consistent with a hand gesture using the first and second fingers.
• 14 April: All of a sudden, the International Monetary Fund announces that it had expanded its New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB) facility from the existing level of $50 billion, by $500 billion, to $550 billion. Now, you are entitled to take the Fund’s public statement covering this development at its face value, if you want to. Alternatively, you could justifiably speculate here that, given the known DUPLICATION PRINCIPLE, $500 billion of the remittances sent over by the Bank of England for the Settlements payouts was ‘suddenly’ ‘made available’ to the Fund. You would be fully entitled to be suspicious, in the light of the timing of this development.
• Meanwhile the Fund’s statement on the expansion of its New Arrangements to Borrow, released on 14th April, issued to the IMF Press Room, reads as follows:

‘The NAB is a standing set of credit arrangements under which participants commit resources to IMF lending when these are needed to supplement quota resources. The newly expanded NAB will become operational when it receives formal acceptances from the required proportion of current and potential participants, which will require legislative backing in some cases’.

‘The expansion of the NAB will make an important contribution to global financial stability, but it is not a substitute for a general increase in the Fund’s resources. The Fund is, and shall remain, a quota-based institution. It is important now that member countries rapidly take the necessary steps to make the increased resources available’.

‘The NAB is a credit arrangement between the IMF and a group of members and institutions to provide supplementary resources to the IMF when these are needed to forestall or cope with an impairment of the monetary system. The NAB is supplementary to quota resources, which are made up of the quota subscriptions that each country pays upon joining the Fund, broadly based on its relative size in the world economy. IMF quotas currently total 217.4 billion Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) (about $330 billion). Like quota allocations, the NAB is reviewed on a regular basis’.

‘The recent unprecedented shock confronting the global economy [Unspoken: due to unfettered Fraudulent Finance – Editor] has led to a sharp increase in the demand for IMF financing’.

‘To ensure that the IMF continues to have sufficient resources to meet demand, leaders of the Group of Twenty (G-20) agreed in April 2009 that immediate financing from members of $250 billion would subsequently be folded into an expanded and more flexible NAB, increased by up to $500 billion. The G-20 leaders then reaffirmed their commitment on 5th September 2009 to a tripling of the resources available to the IMF, from a pre-crisis level of about $250 million…. Pending the entering into force of the expanded NAB, the member countries have pledged more than $300 billion in immediate bilateral financing should the Fund require additional resources for lending’.

However, bearing in mind the DUPLICATION PRINCIPLE on which the shadow Fraudulent Finance system operates, the otherwise unassailable accuracy of this statement can be seen to provide cover for the sudden ‘availability’ of $500 billion, while a further $300 billion of resources is also additionally ‘available’ – close to the $1.0 trillion which we were told recently was the Settlements shortfall. Since de facto the International Monetary Fund takes orders from the White House (the CIA/NSA cadres in the basement), the foregoing formal statement can be treated as cover.
• 15 April: The Securities and Exchange Commission files its Complaint against Goldman Sachs & Co. and its employee Mr Fabrice Tourre [see our report and the complete text, posted on 18th April 2010: Archive]. We are later informed that the filing of this Complaint was a DIRECT consequence of the Complaint filed by Hodges and Associates, of Pasadena, CA, on behalf of certain CMKM victims against the Securities and Exchange Commission, and against top current and former SEC officials [see our report dated 9th January, Archive].

The SEC and personnel accepted service of the Complaint and because the SEC is an official US entity, were given 60 days to respond. Thanks to the sterling work on this matter performed by Tim Barello at Examiner.com, National Edition, very belatedly, a number of outlets have at last realised the significance of this case which we characterised from the outset on 9th January as the biggest legal case in world history. The CMKX victims seek $3.87 trillion in compensation, given that some 2.25 trillion of phantom CMKX shares were floated via a platform associated with the SEC itself during the corrupt Bush II Presidency.

(As you can see from a separate entry here, George W. Bush Jr. appears to be free to roam the world with his former Treasury Secretary, John Snow, having scandalously obtained the demanded immunity from prosecution provided by the World Court in the most disgraceful mass abuse of its powers since that entity was established).
• 16 April onwards: The SEC’s complaint against Goldman Sachs & Co. serves the purpose of obfuscating the CMKX/CMKM case against the Securities and Exchange Commission itself. It also serves the interests of President Obama and the Democrats, with Obama asserting that he will veto any Bill (e.g. from Senator Dodd) which does not discipline the derivatives sector. Obama appears not yet to have caught up with the fact that all securitisation is illegal under US law, so that 100% of these transactions, like legislation passed by the British Parliament since 2000, are null and void. No doubt he is being advised that this issue is academic, as all laws that Obama himself signs into law may turn out to be null and void as well, either contemporaneously or in the future, should it transpire that the man occupies the White House illegitimately.

The consequence of any such ‘finding’, by the way, would amount to treason and might trigger the ultimate penalty (even though he is a tool of the Intelligence Power and a CIA operative himself. As we know, once the Intelligence Power has ‘finished with’ an operative, it is common practice to treat him or her like dirt and to allow them to dangle and rot sine die in the wind, or jail).
• 17 April: The Wall Street Journal reports that the Dutch bank, Rabobank, has filed a further (second) lawsuit against Merrill Lynch, alleging that this entity engaged in activity comparable to Goldman Sachs’ behaviour as explained in the SEC Civil Complaint against Goldman Sachs with Paulson – i.e., devising a Collateralised Debt Obligation (CDO) on behalf of Magnetar, a hedge fund which used it to take a short position, without disclosing this material fact to the investors.

Specifically, Richard Smith wrote: ‘Merrill Lynch & Co. engaged in the “same type of fraudulent conduct” that Goldman Sachs was accused of committing by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in a lawsuit on Friday…. Lawyers for Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbak BA, or Rabobank, stated that Merrill Lynch committed a similar fraud in the structuring of a $1.5 billion Collateralized Debt Obligation…’.

‘Rabobank sued Merrill Lynch in New York State Court last year, alleging it was owed about $45 million in a senior secured loan when the CDO defaulted and was liquidated in 2008. The Dutch bank claimed [that] Merrill Lynch misrepresented that the CDO was a carefully structured investment vehicle when Rabobank made a $57.7 million upfront loan in March 2007’.

‘Rabobank claims that the … CDO was a “dumping ground” for impaired subprime assets and was structured with the help of a prized Merrill Lynch hedge fund client as a bet against the mortgage backed securities market’.
• 21 April: The Editor is informed that ongoing ‘real-time’ progress towards the completion of the Settlements payouts is quote proving ‘sensitive and bloody’ unquote. The Editor queried ‘bloody’ and received confirmation that this description was both accurate and intended. The related G-20 meeting takes place at the Spring Meetings in Washington this week.

THEY ARE AVOIDING THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM You will of course have noticed that the SEC Complaint against Goldman Sachs and the Rabobank lawsuit, both address the evidence of Fraud in the Inducement specific to the Fraudulent Finance operations in question. What these cases don’t do is to cut through all the specifically fraudulent breaches of the US 1933 and 1934 Securities Acts etc [see Legal Notes below] and the SEC’s Rules and Regulations, by making it clear that ALL SECURITISATION UNDER U.S. LAW IS ILLEGAL, as you can see from our report dated 18th April 2010 [Archive].
• The elephant stands in every Courthouse dealing with Fraudulent Finance in the United States.
• If all securitisation is illegal, then the frauds committed within this context are of course frauds within overall frauds: a fact of immense significance and sensitivity.

This bizarre state of affairs arises from the fact that all these institutions and entities, INCLUDING THE S.E.C. ITSELF, have been systematically engaged for years in breaking the law. So if they were to concede that securitisation is illegal, WHICH IT IS, they might well fear that their cases would be thrown out by the Courts, since all contracts entered into so as to facilitate fraud and crime, are null and void. The consequences would be unimaginable.

Therefore, the avalanche of Court cases that is confidently anticipated in the aftermath of the SEC Complaint against Goldman Sachs – which will serve the interests of the Democrats this election year as well as the urgent obfuscation needs of the SEC itself – will all themselves be duplicitous, since the SEC and the institutions bringing these lawsuits will, as noted, be pin-pointing specific breaches of the Securities Acts and of SEC Rules and Regulations, when the very activity in which they were engaged was itself fraudulent and criminal in the first place under US law.

No doubt some evil brains had already worked this one out. But since the genie has long since lost sight of the bottle from which it escaped due to the exposures, you can probably see now that the entire Fraudulent Finance derivatives securitisation party resembles the assembly hall against a pillar of which Sampson leaned, when he caused the entire upper storey and roof to fall in on the complacent, jeering spectators feasting within.

GREECE AND PORTUGAL POISED TO DESTROY THE EURO Under the preceding Greek Government, Citibank, Athens, as we have long since reported, was the counterparty for illicit off-balance sheet derivatives trading operations.

In the United States, all securitisation is illegal [see report dated 18th April 2010]. But this does not apply in non-Common Law countries. Therefore, such dubious, illicit trading operations are ‘semi-legitimised’ by the foreign counterparty’s participation (in the eyes of the US perpetrators).
• As a consequence of this Fraudulent Finance activity, Greece accumulated a huge portfolio of derivative assets held off-balance sheet, which are worthless.

Having been massively engaged in similar Fraudulent Finance activity, as a willing and actively instrumental partner, only to be double-crossed and deceived like every other participating counterparty by the CIA and the Bush Crime Family, Germany has been ‘enronised’, too – and its own cupboard is accordingly bare. Therefore, Germany cannot help Greece (not least given that there are countries like Portugal which are about to ‘blow’ too). Hence, after its usual weeks of bombast, the EU Collective’s necessary decision to ‘bring in the International Monetary Fund’.

In an interview with der Spiegel, Wolfgang Schauble, the German Finance Minister, demanded that Germans should support a joint EU-IMF bailout for Greece with up to 45 billion Euros, in order to avoid a ‘financial meltdown’. And Herr Schauble made the following revealing observations, too:

‘Greece’s debts are all in Euros, but it isn’t clear who holds how much of these debts’ – because under Fraudulent Finance off-balance sheet securitisation arrangements below the radar, nobody has any information about any other tiers of participants. So the German Finance Minister clearly understands the core problem. He therefore elaborated:

‘The consequences of a national bankruptcy would be incalculable. Greece is just as systemically important as a major bank’.

Given the postponement due to the travel restrictions imposed by the stupid European authorities themselves [see above] of talks between officials from the IMF, the European Commission and the European Central Bank at the Greek Foreign Ministry on 19th April, the cost of insuring against a Greek default rocketed upwards. Specifically, five-year Greek Credit Default Swaps surged from 438.2 basis points on 16th April, to a peak level of 4.82 percentage points – meaning that it cost 482,000 Euros to insure every 10 million Euros’ worth of five-year Greek Government bonds.

Portugal’s situation is extremely precarious, with the former IMF Chief Economist, Simon Johnson, on record as stating recently that Portugal is ‘on the verge of bankruptcy’. While its public sector indebtedness, at 84% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) this year, is lower than Greece’s 124% (2010 estimates by the European Commission), in 2008 Portuguese private sector debt reached 239% of GDP, compared to 123% for Greece. Portuguese private debt is now thought to exceed 300% of its Gross Domestic Product.

WE WARNED THIS WOULD HAPPEN IN THE RUN-UP TO 1999: IT’S ON THE RECORD Since, during the run-up to Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) in 1999, we repeatedly warned in International Currency Review that the attempt to unify divergent economies and currencies would be bound eventually to collapse, we have very little sympathy for all the hand-wringing that is now fashionable, especially by financial journalists who weren’t around when our clear warnings were published (they remain accessible, of course, in libraries around the world).

Likewise we have even less sympathy for the ideologues who are now reported to be ‘mystified’ as to why the Portuguese economy fell apart in the 1990s – with productivity at 64% of the average for the EU-15 ‘Member States’. The Europhiliacs thought that the southern European ‘Member States’’ economies would converge ‘over time’. But time has been called on their knee-jerk delusions.

A financial correspondent for The Daily Telegraph commented on 19th April:

‘This should be no surprise. A study of the Latin Monetary Union after 1865 by Kee-Hong Bae and Warren Bailey showed that there was no economic convergence for half a century. Weak states cheated, inflating stealthily by dumping silver coins on others. The project was kept alive by French subsidies. That is what haunts Germany today’.

Our heart bleeds. It is the pan-Germans who have masterminded and driven this EU project for generations, but most especially since publication of the Nazi planning compendium Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft [European Economic Community] in Berlin in 1942 [see the Editor’s works The European Union Collective and The New Underworld Order]. So what we are being told is that the Germans are having to contemplate the bitter taste of the medicine that they prescribed, in their arrogance, for the Rest of Europe.

In prescribing this medicine, they were driven by their hegemony ambitions, rather than by proper consideration of the consequences for their intended satrap EU ‘Member States’. Now, because Germany is itself the biggest storehouse of worthless derivative off-balance sheet fake assets on earth and is therefore effectively bust, it has had to concede that the International Monetary Fund must be involved – which is absolutely NOT what the pan-Germans originally had in mind. On the contrary, their ‘vision’ was that Germany should become not merely the industrial powerhouse of German-controlled Europe after stealing the industries of others, but its financial centre as well.

Given that, like the criminalist operatives at the highest levels in the United States, Germans are typically incapable of discerning when they have been defeated and their game is up, they are persisting – along with the brainwashed leaders of the satrap European ‘Member States’ – with a political project which, whether they choose to accept it or not, is doomed to eventual collapse.

The Greeks basically threatened to pull out of EMU if they didn’t get bailed out (using some pointed remarks about Nazi abuse of Greece in the past); so rather than allow the weak Greek economy to recover through an urgently necessary devaluation of their currency, to save their thick skins they prefer instead to bottle Greece up for generations in a downward spiral of deflation.

The brainwashed Greek Euro-ideologues need to seize the initiative and get out from under, even though it’s being argued, naturally, that this would bankrupt the country as the price of insuring its bonds, already through the roof, would hit the highest level of the building and emerge into the stratosphere. It’s a choice between reviving the economy through a unilateral devaluation having restored the Drachma, or painful descent towards irreversible collapse as a failed state, later.
• And although Portugal’s case is different, the same outcome basically applies.

Believe it or not, ‘Nick’ Clegg, the Liberal Democrat Euro-ideologue who has risen to the top of the British electoral pile due to the stupidity of ‘Conservative’ Central Office’ in allowing Mr Cameron to participate in these fake TV ‘Debates’, is a rabid enthusiast for Britain joining the Euro. He thinks it’s a ‘good thing’ for a country to lose control of its currency, monetary and ultimately fiscal policy. This man is extremely dangerous, a brainwashed Euro-ideologue, and as stupid and pig-headed as the pan-Germans. He can see what is happening in the Eurozone, but looks the other way.

THE IMF’S DOUBLE-TAXATION PROPOSAL FOR BANKS The IMF Press Room was electrified when the IMF released advance and leaked information from a confidential document prepared for the Group of Twenty (G-20) meeting of Finance Ministers being held this week in Washington. The International Monetary Fund has proposed the following two taxes on (corrupt) financial institutions – which are so unpopular worldwide, that the likelihood of these proposals being implemented must be rated quite high:
• A Financial Stability Contribution, which would represent a levy to finance any future support in an incipient systemic crisis.
• A Financial Activities Tax levied on the sum of profits gained at financial institutions and the remuneration of bank officers and traders. The Fund stated that this tax would be the least distortionary method of raising money from banks.

Meanwhile the latest issue of the Fund’s Global Stability Report has warned that sharply rising sovereign debt will exert further pressures on lending markets coincident with the world’s banks trying to refinance some $5.0 trillion in short-term borrowings – a round-about way of saying that a large number of banks all over the world, are bust.

But the International Monetary Fund also needs to distance itself from any residual whiff of internal corruption. One way of achieving this would be to close internal ‘offshore’ accounts held within the Fund by such dubious characters as former US Presidents, including William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton. We know that the dialectical, duplicity norm applies right across this sector. But one would have thought that, with all that has been revealed – and is now swamping the ‘mainstream’ media, despite its belated arrival at the party – it’s definitively clean-up time, at last.
Notes and references:

(1): Eesti Pank: Persoonid ja saladused, Urmas Kaji, Talinn, 2003, page 145.

(2): Ibid, page 140

(3): Kesknädalo, 6th December 2000.

(4): Data on Siim Kallas extracted with permission from a collection of essays by Ashley Mote, former MEP for South East England, and based on an article first published in 2008, confirmed in part by our own separate information.

(5): Weather Eye, Paul Simons, The Times, London, 19 April 2010, page 61.

(6) ‘Days are turned to nights as clouds of falling ash cover everything in sight’, Hildur Helga Sigurdardottir, reporting from Reykyavik, The Times, London, 19th April 2010.

(7): Assets Of Representative Nancy Pelosi: Democrat-CA:
• 1600 Atlas Peak Road, Napa, CA

• 235 Twelve Inc. LLC Common Stock (= 235 Second Twelve Inc. LLC)

• 25 Point Lobos, San Francisco, CA: Commercial Property

• 45 Belden Place, San Francisco, CA: 4-storey commercial building

• 723 Mule Ears Court, Norden, CA: Town home

• 820 Sir Francis Drake Blvd., San Anselmo, CA: Commercial Property

• Access Technology Partners, LP

• Adaytum Software, Inc.: Common Stock

• Advanced Fiber Communications: Public Common Stock

• Agile Software

• Alliance Gaming Corp.: Public Common Stock

• Alter Ego: Common Stock

• Amazon.com: Public Common Stock

• America’s Doctors.com: Common Stock

• Aplion.com: Common Stock

•Apogee Networks, Inc.: Common Stock

•Aristotle Publishing, Inc.: Common Stock

•Ashlar, Inc.: Common Stock

•AT&T Public: Common Stock

•Atipa Fund B (see Oculan Corporation)

•Attenza, LLC: Common Stock

•Auberge du Soleil, Rutherford, CA: Owns resort hotel

•Avaya: Public Common Stock

•Bank of America, San Francisco

•Bank of America, Washington, DC

•Beacon Education Management: Common Stock

•BF Enterprises: Common Stock

•Borel Estate Company: Owns shopping center

•Briazz: Public Common Stock

•Broadcom Corp.: Public Common Stock

•Broadway Property, San Francisco, CA: Real Estate Option

•Builder’s Info. Group: Common Stock (Formerly Netclerk)

•Bullhorn (Formerly Bridgepath LLC: Common Stock)

•Calico Commerce: Public Common Stock

•Chalone Wine Group, Ltd.

•Cierra Photonics: Common Stock

•Cisco Systems, Inc.: Common Stock

•CMGI, Inc.: Common Stocks

•Co-Net (Formerly Simplexis.com): Common Stock

•Coach, Inc.: Public common stock

•Collab.net: Common Stock

•Collaborative Group: Common Stock

•ComCast: Public Common Stock

•Command Audio: Common Stock

•Commerce One, Inc.: Common Stock

•Congressional Credit Union, Washington, DC

•CopperCom, Inc.: Common Stock

•Covalent Technologies: Common Stock

•Critical Path Inc.: Public Common Stock

•Currenex: Common Stock (Formerly FX Trades)

•Digital Fountain: Common Stock

•Digital Intelligence (Now Picture IQCorp)

•EDI Associates, Mill Valley, CA: Hotel Investment

•Emulex: Public Common Stock

•Engage, Inc.: Common Stock

•Evident: Common Stock (Formerly Apogee)

•Fastnet: Common Stock

•Financial Leasing Services, S.F., CA: Investment company

•Forty-Five Belden Corp., S.F., CA: Investment Company

•Genetope Corp.: Public Common Stock

•Getty Images, Inc.: Public Common Stock

•Granite Ventures, LP

•Guru.com: Common Stock (now Unicru)

•IKnowMed Systems, Inc.

•Infospace, Inc.: Public common stock

•Interloci, LLC: Public Common Stock

•Internap Delaware: Common Stock (formerly Internap Network Services)

•Internap Network Services, LLC: Common Stock (= Internap Delaware)

•Internet Cap. Group: Public Stock

•Intraop, LLC: Common Stock

•Japan Partners: Common Stock (AKA Isochron Data Corp.)

•Jet Blue Air: Public Common Stock

•Johnson & Johnson: Public Common Stock

•Learning Technologies, Inc.- Common Stock

•LEG Partners, III, LP: Common Stock

•Liberate Technologies: Public Common Stock

•Lionis Gate Limited Partnership (Cordavalle): Golf Development Partnership

•Lucent Techonolgies: Public Common Stock (Formerly Nexabit)

•LuxN, LLC: Common Stock

•McGrath Rentcorp, Inc.: Public Common Stock

•Microsoft Corp.: Public Common Stock

•MontaVista, LLC: Common Stock

•Mosher Partners, LP, Sacramento, CA: Real Estate Partnership

•Natelli Communities: Real Estate Partnership

•Nautilus Leasing Services: Container leasing company

•Navis Holdings, LLC: Common Stock

•Net2Phone, Inc.: Public Common Stock

•Netcessity: Common Stock

•NetSchools Corp.: Common Stock (Now Plato-Common Stock)

•Niku Corp.: Public Common Stock

•Niman Ranch: Common Stock

•Nine Forty Five Battery, LLC, San Francisco, CA: Real Estate Partnership

•Nine Hundred One Battery, San Francisco, CA: Real Estate Partnership

•Oakwood Homes Corp: Bonds

•Oculan Corp: Common Stock

•Odyssey, LLC: Common stock

•Orlimar, LLC: Common Stock

•Overstock.com: Public Common Stock

•Pacific Island Resources LLC: Common Stock

•Piatti Restaurant Co., Tiburon, CA: Restaurant Opening Company

•Picture IQ Corp.: Common Stock (AKA Digital Intelligence)

•Plato: Common Stock (Formerly Netschools: Common Stock)

•Plumtree Software, Inc.: Common Stock

•Polycom: Public Common Stock

•Potomac Investment Association, Gaithersburg, MD: Real Estate Partnership

•Procure Point: Common Stock

•QIC (Quinton Instrument Company): Public Common Stock (Now Quinton Cardiology Sys., Inc.)

•QualComm, Inc.: Public Common Stock

•Rainmaker Systems, Inc: Common Stock

•Read-Rite Corp, Inc.: Public Common Stock

•Ready Router (Now Netcessity)

•Recommender 2: Common Stock

•Redenvelope: Public Common stock

•REOF V: Real Estate Partnership

•RF Micro Devices, Inc: Public Common Stock

•Robert Half Intl., Inc.: Public Common Stock

•Salesforce.com, LLC: Common Stock

•Salon.com: Public Common Stock

•Shutterfly: Common Stock

•Skellenger Lane, Rutherford, CA: 8-acre vineyard

•Slam Dunk Networks, Inc.

•Sonus Networks, Inc.-Public Stock

•Speakeasy, Inc.: Common Stock

•Spirian, LLC: Common Stock

•Stoneridge, LLC

•Sun Microsystems: Public Common Stock

•Support Inc.: Common Stock (AKA Support Soft, Inc.)

•TeraOp, LLC: Common Stock

•Thirteen Hundred One Sansome, LLC: Real Estate Partnership

•Tripath Technology, Inc.: Common Stock

•Trivium Systems, Inc: Common Stock

•Trux Gate Associates Ltd, Real Estate Partnership

•Unicru Common Stock (Formerly Guru.com)

•Union Bank of California, San Francisco, CA: savings account

•USA DR: Common Stock

•Vanguard Airlines, Inc: Public Common Stock

•Wells Fargo Bank, San Francisco, CA: Savings account

•Witness Sys, Inc.: Public Common Stock

•Xtreme Spectrum, Inc.: Common Stock

•Yantra Corp: Common Stock

•Yerac Associates: Investments

•Zinfandel Lane, St. Helena, CA

(8): ‘Sarkozy shuts out chief spin doctor’, report from Paris by Henry Samuel, The Daily Telegraph, 13th April 2007.

(9): It should be understood that, self-evidently, obtaining information on such sensitive issues is difficult; and, at best, the only information that may become available is couched in general terms.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

.

to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
Advertisements

Posted in Christopher STORY, Edward Harle, Global Reports, IN MEMORIAM - Christopher STORY | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

TEXT OF THE S.E.C.’S COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 18/04/2010

TEXT OF THE S.E.C.’S COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS

.

TEXT OF THE S.E.C.’S COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS PROSPECTS FOR GOLDMAN ARE DEVASTATING AND COULD LEAD TO ITS COLLAPSE Sunday 18 April 2010 17:57 •

IMPLICATIONS OF THE S.E.C.’S CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS & CO.
• THE S.E.C.’S PRESS RELEASE RE. ITS COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS
• TEXT OF THE S.E.C.’S CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS & CO.
• READ WITH THE ‘SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL’ REPORT: ALSO DATED 18TH APRIL 2010
MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: ‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.
• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.
• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.
• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.
• Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.
• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS: Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010] Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx): SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C. You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.
• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.
NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:
IMPLICATIONS OF THE S.E.C.’S CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. We publish below the text of the Complaint lodged by the Securities and Exchange Commission against Goldman Sachs and Co. and a Goldman employee, Fabrice Tourre, filed with the United States Court for the Southern District of New York, on Friday 16th April 2010. This is only the first devastating development which could lead to the collapse of this institution.
• Other entities that have been engaged in similar activities are cruising for a similar bruising.

It is important to note as follows:

(1): This case PRECISELY illustrates, in many exact parallels, the accuracy of the report also dated 18th April 2010 confirming that SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL.

(2): Specifically, this complaint reveals an ongoing alleged pattern of Fraud in the Inducement, misrepresentation of fact, an intent to deceive targeted against domestic and foreign institutional investors, a conspiracy to procure profits through deception, mail fraud, wire fraud and a general environment of Fraudulent Finance, as specifically exposed for several years by this service.

(3): See in particular: International Currency Review, First Quarter 2009 [Volume 34, Number 2], on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and the de facto (illegitimate) legitimisation of financial corruption through the operation by racketeering money institutions specialising in Fraudulent Finance of sophisticated in Ponzi schemes; edited by your correspondent:
• Architecture of the Corrupt Money Machine: The Legalisation of Financial Corruption: featuring: the Creation of Securitisation and Credit Default Swaps: Analysis by the US securities expert, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
• Description of the resulting derivative Financial Frauds and Scams, WITH FLOW CHARTS showing how it’s done: Analysis by the US securities expert, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
• Glossary of Exotic Derivatives Market Terminology compiled by the US securities expert, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.

With appendices.

(4): The Complaint has to deal with the material issues that presuppose a likely conviction, and so SIDESTEPS the central issue exposed by the ‘securitisation is illegal’ report, which is simply that THIS ACTIVITY IS ILLEGAL.

Paragraph 73 of the Complaint [see below] alleges that the defendants, ‘in connection with the purchase or sale of securities or securities-based swap agreements, by the use of means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce or of the mails, directly or indirectly (a) employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud; (b) made untrue statements of material facts or omissions of material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) engaged in transactions, practices or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon persons’.

(5): A German bank based in Düsseldorf, IKB Deutsche lndustriebank AG (“IKB”), lost about $150 million as a result of this alleged scam. Altogether, investors in the liabilities of ABACUS are alleged to have lost more than $1 billion.

(6): A Civil case is in fact far more prospectively devastating than a criminal case (given that the SEC is dealing with institutions as well as one individual employee to start with), because:
• The case will be decided on the basis of the PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE.
• Scope arises for R.I.C.O. actions providing for awards of three times damages.
• Following conviction, the victims can sue Goldman under R.I.C.O. (three times damages).
• Following conviction, the victims of the victims can sue the first layer of victims, Goldman and the other participants as appropriate under R.I.C.O. (three times damages).
• Individual Directors, executives, securities personnel and those involved in decision-making both within Goldman Sachs & Co. and at other involved institutions, can prospectively be charged individually and severally with fraud.
• The ultimate outcome is that Goldman could be in court for the next 20 years, except that, realistically, it will in all probability cease to exist.

(7): We were authoritatively advised on Saturday 17th April 2010 that this SEC Complaint against Goldman Sachs & Co. and a named Goldman employee was specifically triggered as a DIRECT consequence of the Complaint against the Securities and Exchange Commission and individually and severally against current and former SEC officials filed by the lawyers for the CMKX victims, Hodges and Associates, of Pasadena, CA, in January [see our report dated 9th January 2010] claiming $3.87 trillion following the floating of 2.25 trillion of phantom shares.

Service of that complaint was accepted by the SEC’s Office of General Counsel both on behalf of the SEC and of current officers, while former SEC officers accepted service and had to arrange their own legal representation.
THE S.E.C.’S PRESS RELEASE RE. ITS COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS SEC Charges Goldman Sachs With Fraud in Structuring and Marketing of CDO Tied to Subprime Mortgages

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 2010-59

Washington, D.C., April 16, 2010 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Goldman, Sachs & Co. and one of its vice presidents for defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages as the U.S. housing market was beginning to falter.

Goldman Sachs structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) that hinged on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Goldman Sachs failed to disclose to investors vital information about the CDO, in particular the role that a major hedge fund played in the portfolio selection process and the fact that the hedge fund had taken a short position against the CDO.

“The product was new and complex but the deception and conflicts are old and simple”, said Robert Khuzami, Director of the Division of Enforcement. “Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party”.

Kenneth Lench, Chief of the SEC’s Structured and New Products Unit, added:

“The SEC continues to investigate the practices of investment banks and others involved in the securitization of complex financial products tied to the U.S. housing market as it was beginning to show signs of distress”.

The SEC alleges that one of the world’s largest hedge funds, Paulson & Co., paid Goldman Sachs to structure a transaction in which Paulson & Co. could take short positions against mortgage securities chosen by Paulson & Co. based on a belief that the securities would experience credit events.

According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the marketing materials for the CDO known as ABACUS 2007-AC1 (ABACUS) all represented that the RMBS portfolio underlying the CDO was selected by ACA Management LLC (ACA), a third party with expertise in analyzing credit risk in RMBS.

The SEC alleges that undisclosed in the marketing materials and unbeknownst to investors, the Paulson & Co. hedge fund, which was poised to benefit if the RMBS defaulted, played a significant role in selecting which RMBS should make up the portfolio.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that after participating in the portfolio selection, Paulson & Co. effectively shorted the RMBS portfolio it helped select by entering into credit default swaps (CDS) with Goldman Sachs to buy protection on specific layers of the ABACUS capital structure. Given that financial short interest, Paulson & Company had an economic incentive to select RMBS that it expected to experience credit events in the near future. Goldman Sachs did not disclose Paulson & Co.’s short position or its role in the collateral selection process in the term sheet, flip book, offering memorandum, or other marketing materials provided to investors.

The SEC alleges that Goldman Sachs Vice President Fabrice Tourre was principally responsible for ABACUS 2007-AC1. Mr Tourre structured the transaction, prepared the marketing materials, and communicated directly with investors. Tourre allegedly knew of Paulson & Co.’s undisclosed short interest and role in the collateral selection process. In addition, he misled ACA into believing that Paulson & Co. invested approximately $200 million in the equity of ABACUS, indicating that Paulson & Co.’s interests in the collateral selection process were closely aligned with ACA’s interests. In reality, however, their interests were sharply conflicting.

According to the SEC’s complaint, the deal closed on April 26, 2007, and Paulson & Co. paid Goldman Sachs approximately $15 million for structuring and marketing ABACUS. By Oct. 24, 2007, 83 percent of the RMBS in the ABACUS portfolio had been downgraded and 17 percent were on negative watch. By Jan. 29, 2008, 99 percent of the portfolio had been downgraded.

Investors in the liabilities of ABACUS are alleged to have lost more than $1 billion.

The SEC’s complaint charges Goldman Sachs and Tourre with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. The Commission seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, and financial penalties.

For more information about this enforcement action, contact: Lorin L. Reisner Deputy Director, SEC Enforcement Division
(202) 551-4787.

Kenneth R. Lench Chief, Structured and New Products Unit, SEC Enforcement Division
(202) 551-4938.

Reid A. Muoio Deputy Chief, Structured and New Products Unit, SEC Enforcement Division
(202) 551-4488

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-59.htm

TEXT OF THE S.E.C.’S CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS & CO.:

UNITED STATES COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff

v.

GOLDMAN SACHS & CO and FABRICE TOURRE, Defendants.

COMPLAINT [Securities Fraud]

10-CV-3229

ECF CASE

Jury Trial Demanded
Plaintiff, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) alleges as follows against the defendants named above.

OVERVIEW

1. The Commission brings this securities fraud action against Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“GS&Co”) and a GS&Co employee, Frabrice Tourre (“Tourre”), for making materially misleading statements and omissions in connection with a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) GS&Co structured and marketed to investors.

This synthetic CDO, ABACUS 2007-AC1, was tied to the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and was structured and marketed by GS&Co in early 2007 when the United States housing market and related securities were beginning to show signs of distress. Synthetic CDOs like ABACUS 2007-AC1 contributed to the recent financial crisis by magnifying losses associated with the downturn in the United States housing market.

2. GS&Co marketing materials for ABACUS 2007-AC1 – including the term sheet, flip book and offering memorandum for the CDO – all represented that the reference portfolio of residential mortgage-backed securitiesunderlying the CDO was selected by ACA Management LLC (“AC.A.”), a third-party with experience analyzing credit risk in RMBS. Undisclosed in the marketing materials and unbeknownst to investors, a large hedge fund, Paulson & Co. Inc. (“Paulson”), with economic interests directly adverse to investors in the ABACUS 2007-AC1 CDO, played a significant role in the portfolio selection process.

After participating in the selection of the reference portfolio, Paulson effectively shorted the residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio it helped select by entering into credit default swaps (“CDS”) with GS&Co to buy protection on specific layers of the ABACUS 2007-AC1 capital structure. Given its financial short interest, Paulson had an economic incentive to choose RMBS that it expected to experience credit events in the near future, GS&Co did not disclose Paulson’s adverse economic interests or its role in the portfolio selection process in the term sheet, flip book, offering memorandum or other marketing materials provided to investors.

3. In sum, GS&Co arranged a transaction at Paulson’s request in which Paulson heavily influenced the selection of the portfolio to suit its economic interests, but failed to disclose to investors, as part of the description of the portfolio selection process contained in the marketing materials used to promote the transaction, Paulson’s role in the portfolio selection process or its adverse economic interests.

4. Tourre was principally responsible for ABACUS 2007-AC1. Tourre devised the transaction, prepared the marketing materials and communicated directly with investors. Tourre knew of Paulson’s undisclosed short interest and its role in the collateral selection process. Tourre also misled ACA into believing that Paulson invested approximately $200 million in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1 (a long position) and, accordingly, that Paulson’s interests in the collateral section process were aligned with ACA’s when in reality Paulson’s interests were sharply conflicting.

5. The deal closed on April 26,2007. Paulson paid GS&Co approximately $15 million for structuring and marketing ABACUS 2007-AC1. By October 24, 2007, 83% of the RMBS in the ABACUS 2007-AC1 portfolio had been downgraded and 17% were on negative watch. By January 29, 2008, 99% of the portfolio had been downgraded. As a result, investors in the ABACUS 2007-AC1 CDO lost over $l billion. Paulson’s opposite CDS positions yielded a profit of approximately $l billion for Paulson.

6. By engaging in the misconduct described herein, GS&Co and Tourre directly or indirectly engaged in transactions, acts, practices and a course of business that violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of l933, 15 U.S.C. §77q(a) (“the Securities Act”), Section l0(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) (“the Exchange Act”) and Exchange Act Rule l0b-5, 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5. The Commission seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, civil penalties and other appropriate and necessary equitable relief from both defendants.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

7. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Sections 2l(d), 21(e), and 27 of the Exchange Act [l5 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d), 78u(e), and 78aa]. Each defendant directly or indirectly, made use of the means or instruments of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or the facilities of a national securities exchange in connection with the transactions, acts, practices, and courses of business alleged herein. Certain of the acts, practices, and courses of conduct constituting the violations of law alleged herein occurred within this judicial district.

DEFENDANTS

8. Goldman, Sachs & Co. is the principal United States broker-dealer of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a global investment banking, securities and investment management firm headquartered in New York City. GS&Co structured and marketed ABACUS 2OO7-AC1.

9. Fabrice Tourre, age 31, is a registered representative with GS&Co. Tourre was the GS&Co employee principally responsible for the structuring and marketing of ABACUS 2007-AC1, Tourre worked as a Vice President on the structured product correlation trading desk at GS&Co headquarters in New York City during the relevant period.

Tourre presently works in London as an Executive Director of Goldman Sachs lnternational.

FACTS

A. GS&CO’S CORRELATTON TRADING DESK

10. GS&Co’s structured product correlation hading desk was created in and around late 2004/early 2005. Among the services it provided was the structuring and marketing of a series of synthetic CDOs called “ABACUS” whose performance was tied to RMBS. GS&Co sought to protect and to expand this profitable franchise in a competitive market throughout the relevant period. According to an internal GS&Co memorandum to the Goldman Sachs

Mortgage Capital Committee (“MCC”) dated March 12, 2007, the “ability to structure and execute complicated transactions to meet multiple clients’ needs and objectives is key for our franchise”, and “[e]xecuting this transaction [ABACUS 2007-AC1] and others like it helps position Goldman to compete more aggressively in the growing market for synthetics written on structured products”.

B. PAULSON’S INVESTMENT STRATEGY

11. Paulson & Co. Inc. (“Paulson”) is a hedge fund founded in 1994. Beginning in 2006, Paulson created two funds, known as the Paulson Credit Opportunity Funds, which took a bearish view on subprime mortgage loans by buying protection through CDS on various debt securities.

A CDS is an over-the-counter derivative contract under which a protection buyer makes periodic premium payments and the protection seller makes a contingent payment if a reference obligation experiences a credit event.

12. RMBS are securities backed by residential mortgages. Investors receive payments out of the interest and principal on the underlying mortgages. Paulson developed an investment strategy based upon the belief that, for a variety of reasons, certain mid-and-subprime RMBS rated “Triple B”, meaning bonds rated “BBB” by S&P or “Baa2” by Moody’s, would experience credit events.

The Triple B tranche is the lowest investment grade RMBS and, after equity, the first part of the capital structure to experience losses associated with a deterioration of the underlying mortgage loan portfolio.

13. CDOs are debt securities collateralized by debt obligations including RMBS. These securities are packaged and generally held by a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”) that issues notes entitling their holders to payments derived from the underlying assets. In a synthetic CDO, the SPV does not actually own a portfolio of fixed income assets, but rather enters into CDSs that reference the performance of a portfolio (the SPV does hold some collateral securities separate from the reference portfolio that it uses to make payment obligations).

14. Paulson came to believe that synthetic CDOs whose reference assets consisted of certain Triple B-rated mid-and-subprime RMBS would experience significant losses and, under certain circumstances, even the more senior AAA-rated tranches of these so-called “mezzanine” CDOs would become worthless.

C. GS&CO AND PAULSON DISCUSS A PROPOSED TRANSACTION

15. Paulson performed an analysis of recent-vintage Triple B-rated RMBS and identified various bonds it expected to experience credit events. Paulson then asked GS&Co to help it to purchase protection, through the use of CDS, on the RMBS it had adversely selected, meaning chosen in the belief that the bonds would experience credit events’

16. Paulson discussed with GS&Co possible transactions in which counterparties to its short positions might be found. Among the transactions considered were synthetic CDOs whose performance was tied to Triple B-rated RMBS.

Paulson discussed with GS&Co the creation of a CDO that would allow Paulson to participate in selecting a portfolio of reference obligations and then effectively short the RMBS portfolio it helped select by entering into CDS with GS&Co to buy protection on specific layers of the synthetic CDO’s capital structure.

17. A Paulson employee explained the investment opportunity as of January 2007 as follows:

“It is true that the market is not pricing the subprime RMBS wipeout scenario.

In my opinion this situation is due to the fact that rating agencies, CDO managers and underwriters have all the incentives to keep the game going, while ‘real money’ investors have neither the analytical tools nor the institutional framework to take action before the losses that one could anticipate based [on] the ‘news’ available everywhere are actually realized”.

18. At the same time, GS&Co recognized that market conditions were presenting challenges to the successful marketing of CDO transactions backed by mortgage-related securities.

For example, portions of an email in French and English sent by Tourre to a friend on January 23, 2007 stated, in English translation where applicable:

‘More and more leverage in the system, The whole building is about to collapse anytime now. Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fab[rice Tourre]… standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implications of those monstrosities!!!”

Similarly, an email on February 11, 2OO7 to Tourre from the head of the GS&Co shuctured product correlation trading desk stated in part, “the CDO biz is dead we don’t have a lot of time Ieft”.

D. INTRODUCTION OF ACA TO THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION

19. GS&Co and Tourre knew that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to place the liabilities of a synthetic CDO if they disclosed to investors that a short investor, such as Paulson, played a significant role in the collateral selection process.

By contrast, they knew that the identification of an experienced and independent third-party collateral manager as having selected the portfolio would facilitate the placement of the CDO liabilities in a market that was beginning to show signs of distress.

20. GS&Co also knew that at least one significant potential investor, IKB Deutsche lndustriebank AG (“IKB”), was unlikely to invest in the liabilities of a CDO that did not utilize a collateral manager to analyze and select the reference portfolio.

21. GS&Co therefore sought a collateral manager to play a role in the transaction proposed by Paulson. Contemporaneous internal correspondence reflects that GS&Co recognized that not every collateral manager would “agree to the type of names [of RMBS] Paulson want[s] to use” and put its “name at risk…on a weak quality portfolio”.

22. In or about January 2007, GS&Co approached ACA and proposed that it serve as the “Portfolio Selection Agent” for a CDO transaction sponsored by Paulson. ACA previously had constructed and managed numerous CDOs for a fee.

As of December 31, 2006, ACA had closed on 22 CDO transactions with underlying portfolios consisting of $15.7 billion of assets.

23. Internal GS&Co communications emphasized the advantages from a marketing perspective of having ACA associated with the transaction. For example, an internal email from Tourre dated February 7,20A7 , stated:

“One thing that we need to make sure ACA understands is that we want their name on this transaction. This is a transaction for which they are acting as portfolio selection agent, this will be important that we can use ACA’s branding to help distribute the bonds”.

24. Likewise, an internal GS&Co memorandum to the Goldman Sachs MCC dated March 12, 2007 described the marketing advantages of ACA’s “brand-name” and “credibility”:

“We expect the strong brand-name of ACA as well as our market-leading position in synthetic CDOs of structured products to result in a successful offering.”

“We expect that the role of ACA as Portfolio Selection Agent will broaden the investor base for this and future ABACUS offerings. We intend to target suitable structured product investors who have previously participated in ACA-managed cashflow CDO transactions or who have previously participated in prior ABACUS transactions. We expect to leverage ACA’s credibility and franchise to help distribute this Transaction”.

E. PAULSON’S PARTICIPATION IN THE COLLATERAL SELECTION PROCESS

25. In late 2006 and early 2407, Paulson performed an analysis of recent-vintage Triple B RMBS and identified over 100 bonds it expected to experience credit events in the near future.

Paulson’s selection criteria favored RMBS that included a high percentage of adjustable rate mortgages, relatively low borrower FICO scores, and a high concentration of mortgages in states like Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada that had recently experienced high rates of home price appreciation. Paulson informed GS&Co that it wanted the reference portfolio for the contemplated transaction to include the RMBS it identified or bonds with similar characteristics.

26. On January 8, 2007, Tourre attended a meeting with representatives from Paulson and ACA at Paulson’s offices in New York City to discuss the proposed transaction.

27. On January 9, 2A07, GS&Co sent an email to ACA with the subject line, “Paulson Portfolio”. Attached to the email was a list of 123 2006 RMBS rated Baa2. On January 9, 20O7, ACA performed an “overlap analysis” and determined that it previously had purchased 62 of the 123 RMBS on Paulson’s list at the same or lower ratings.

28. On January 9, 2007, GS&Co informed ACA that Fabrice Tourre was “very excited by the initial portfolio feedback”.

29. On January 10, 2007, Tourre sent an email to ACA with the subject line, “Transaction Summary”. The text of Tourre’s email began: “we wanted to summarize ACA’s proposed role as ‘Portfolio Selection Agent’ for the transaction that would be sponsored by Paulson & Co. (the ‘Transaction Sponsor’)”. The email continued in relevant part, “[s]tarting portfolio would be ideally what the Transaction Sponsor shared, but there is flexibility around the names”.

30. On January 22, 2007, ACA sent an email to Tourre and others at GS&Co with the subject line, “Paulson Portfolio l-22-10.x1s”. The text of the email began: “Attached please find a worksheet with 86 sub-prime mortgage positions that we would recommend taking exposure to synthetically. Of the 123 names that were originally submitted to us for review, we have included only 55”.

31. On January 27, 2007, ACA met with a Paulson representative in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and they discussed the proposed transaction and reference portfolio. The next day, on January 28, 2007, ACA summarized the meeting in an email to Tourre. Tourre responded via email later that day: “This is confirming my initial impression that [Paulson] wanted to proceed with you subject to agreement on portfolio and compensation structure”.

32. On February 2, 2007, Paulson, Tourre and ACA met at ACA’s offices in New York City to discuss the reference portfolio. Unbeknownst to ACA at the time, Paulson intended to effectively short the RMBS portfolio it helped select by entering into CDS with GS&Co to buy protection on specific layers of the synthetic CDO’s capital structure. Tourre and GS&Co, of course, were fully aware that Paulson’s economic interests with respect to the quality of the reference portfolio were directly adverse to CDO investors. During the meeting, Tourre sent an email to another GS&Co employee stating: “I am at this ACA Paulson meeting, this is surreal”.

Later the same day, ACA emailed Paulson, Tourre, and others at GS&Co a list of 82 RMBS on which Paulson and ACA concurred, plus a list of 2l “replacement” RMBS. ACA sought Paulson’s approval of the revised list, asking: “Let rne know if these work for you at the Baa2 level”.

33. On February 5, 2007, Paulson sent an email to ACA, with a copy to Tourre, deleting eight RMBS recommended by ACA, leaving the rest, and stating that Tourre agreed that 92 bonds were a sufficient portfolio,

34. On February 5, 2007, an internal ACA email asked: “Attached is the revised portfolio that Paulson would like us to commit to – all names are at the Baa2 level. The final portfolio will have between 80 and these 92 names. Are ‘we’ ok to say yes on this portfolio?”

The response was: “Looks good to me. Did [Paulson] give a reason why they kicked out all the Wells [Fargo] deals?” Wells Fargo was generally perceived as one of the higher-quality subprime loan originators.

35. On or about February 26, 2007, after further discussion, Paulson and ACA came to an agreement on a reference portfolio of 90 RMBS for ABACUS 2007-AC1 .

F. GS&CO MISLED INVESTORS BY REPRESENTING THAT ACA SELECTED THE PORTFOLIO WTTHOUT DISCLOSING PAULSON’S SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN DETERMINING THE PORTFOLIO AND ITS ADVERSE ECONOMIC INTERESTS

36. GS&Co’s marketing materials for ABACUS 2007-AC1 were false and misleading because they represented that ACA selected the reference portfolio while omitting any mention that Paulson, a party with economic interests adverse to CDO investors, played a significant role in the selection of the reference portfolio.

37. For example, a 9-page term sheet for ABACUS 2007-AC1 finalized by GS&Co on or about February 26, 2007, described ACA as the “Portfolio Selection Agent” and stated in bold print at the top of the first page that the reference portfolio of RMBS bad been “selected by ACA”.

This document contained no mention of Paulson, its economic interests in the transaction, or its role in selecting the reference portfolio.

38. Similarly, a 65-page flip book for ABACUS 2007-AC1 finalized by GS&Co on or about February 26, 2007 represented on its cover page that the reference portfolio of RMBS had been “selected by ACA Management, LLC”. The flip book included a 28-page overview of ACA describing its business strategy, senior management team, investment philosophy, expertise, hack record and credit selection process, together with a 7-page section of biographical information on ACA officers and employees. Investors were assured that the party selecting the portfolio had an “alignment of economic interest” with investors. This document contained no mention of Paulson, its economic interests in the transaction, or its role in selecting the reference portfolio.

39. Tourre had primary responsibility for preparing the term sheet and flip book.

40. The Goldman Sachs MCC, which included senior-level management of GS&Co, approved the ABACUS 2007-AC1 on or about March 12, 2007. GS&Co expected to earn between $15-and-$20 million for structuring and marketing ABACUS 2007-AC1.

41. On or about April 26, 2007, GS&Co finalized a 178-page offering memorandum for ABACUS 2007-AC1. The cover page of the offering memorandum included a description of ACA as “Portfolio Selection Agent”. The Transaction Overview, Summary and Portfolio Selection Agent sections of the memorandum all represented that the reference portfolio of RMBS had been selected by ACA. This document contained no mention of Paulson, its economic interests in the transaction, or its role in selecting the reference portfolio.

42. Tourre reviewed at least the Summary section of the offering memorandum before it was sent to potential investors.

43. Although the marketing materials for ABACUS 2007-AC1 made no mention of Paulson or of its role in the transaction, internal GS&Co communications clearly identified Paulson, its economic interests, and its role in the transaction. For example, the March 12, 2007 MCC memorandum describing the transaction stated: “Goldman is effectively working an order for Paulson to buy protection on specific layers of the [ABACUS 2007-] AC1 capital structure”.

G. GS&CO MISLED ACA INTO BELIEVING PAULSON WAS LONG EOUITY

44. GS&Co also misled ACA into believing that Paulson was investing in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1 and therefore shared a long interest with CDO investors. The equity tranche is at the bottom of the capital structure and is the first to experience losses associated with any deterioration in the performance of the underlying RMBS. Equity investors therefore have an economic interest in the successful performance of a reference RMBS portfolio. As of early 2007, ACA had participated in a number of CDO transactions involving hedge funds that invested in the equity tranche.

45. Had ACA been aware that Paulson was taking a short position against the CDO, ACA would have been reluctant to allow Paulson & Co. to occupy an influential role in the selection of the reference portfolio because it would present serious reputational risk to ACA, which was in effect endorsing the reference portfolio. ln fact, it is unlikely that ACA would have served as portfolio selection agent had it known that Paulson was taking a significant short position instead of a long equity stake in ABACUS 2007-AC1. Tourre and GSSCo were responsible for ACA’s misimpression that Paulson had a long position, rather than a short position, with respect to the CDO.

46. On January 8, 2007, Tourre attended a meeting with representatives from Paulson and ACA at Paulson’s offices in New York City to discuss the proposed transaction. Paulson & Co.’s economic interest was unclear to ACA, which sought further clarification from GS&Co. Later that day, ACA sent a GS&Co sales representative an email with the subject line “Paulson meeting” that read:

“I have no idea how it went – I wouldn’t say it went poorly, not at all, but I think it didn’t help that we didn’t know exactly how they [Paulson] want to participate in the space.

Can you get us some feedback?”

47. On January 10, 2007, Tourre emailed ACA a “Transaction Summary ”that included a description of Paulson as the “Transaction Sponsor” and referenced a “Contemplated Capital Structure” with a “[0]% – [9]%: pre-committed first loss” as part of the Paulson deal structure.

The description of this “[0]% – [9]%” tranche at the bottom of the capital structure was consistent with the description of an equity tranche and ACA reasonably believed it to be a reference to the equity tranche. In fact, GS&Co never intended to market to anyone a “[0]% – [9]%” first loss equity tranche in this transaction.

48. On January 12, 2007, Tourre spoke by telephone with ACA about the proposed transaction. Following that conversation, on January l4, 20O7, ACA sent an email to the GS&Co sales repres- entative raising questions about the proposed transaction and referring to Paulson’s equity interest. The email, which had the subject line “Call with Fabrice [Tourre] on Friday”, read in pertinent part:

“I certainly hope I didn’t come across too antagonistic on the call with Fabrice [Torre] last week but the structure looks difficult from a debt investor perspective. I can understand Paulson’s equity perspective but for us to put our name on something, we have to be sure that it enhances our reputation”.

49. On January 16, 2007, the GS&Co sales representative forwarded that email to Tourre. As of that date, Tourre knew, or was reckless in not knowing, that ACA had been misled into believing Paulson intended to invest in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1.

50. Based upon the January l0, 2007, “Transaction Summary” sent by Tourre, the January 12,2007 telephone call with Tourre and continuing communications with Tourre and others at GS&Co, ACA continued to believe through the course of the transaction that Paulson would be an equity investor in ABACUS 2007-AC1.

51. On February 12, 2007, ACA’s Commitments Committee approved the firm’s participation in ABACUS as portfolio selection agent. The written approval memorandum described Paulson’s role as follows: “The hedge fund equity investor wanted to invest in the 0%-9% tranche of a static mezzanine ABS CDO backed 100% by subprime residential mortgage securities”.

Handwritten notes from the meeting reflect discussion of “portfolio selection work with the equity investor.”

H. ABACUS 2OO7-AC1 INVESTORS

I. IKB

52. IKB is a commercial bank headquartered in Düsseldorf. Germany. Historically, IKB specialized in lending to small and medium-sized companies. Beginning in and around 2002, IKB, for itself and as an advisor, was involved in the purchase of securitized assets referencing, or consisting of, consumer credit risk including RMBS CDOs backed by U.S. mid-and-subprime mortgages.

IKB’s former subsidiary, IKB Credit Asset Management, provided investment advisory services to various purchasing entities participating in a commercial paper conduit known as the “Rhineland programme conduit”.

53. The identity and experience of those involved in the selection of CDO portfolios was an important investment factor for IKB, In late 2006, IKB informed a GS&Co sales representative and Tourre that it was no longer comfortable investing in the liabilities of CDOs that did not utilize a collateral manager, meaning an independent third-party with knowledge of the U.S. housing market and expertise in analyzing RMBS. Tourre and GS&Co knew that ACA was a collateral manager likely to be acceptable to IKB.

54. In February, March and April 2007, GS&Co sent IKB copies of the ABACUS 2007-AC1 term sheet, flipbook and offering memorandum, all of which represented that the RMBS portfolio had been selected by ACA and omitted any reference to Paulson & Co., its role in selecting the reference portfolio and its adverse economic interests. Those representations and omissions were materially false and misleading because, unbeknownst to IKB, Paulson & Co. played a significant role in the collateral selection process and had financial interests in the transaction directly adverse to IKB. Neither GS&Co nor Tourre informed IKB of Paulson & Co.’s participation in the collateral selection process and its adverse economic interests.

55. The first written marketing materials for ABACUS 2007-AC1 were distributed on February 15, 2007, when GS&Co emailed a preliminary term sheet and reference portfolio to the GS&Co sales representative covering IKB. Tourre was aware these materials would be delivered to IKB.

56. On February 19, 2007, the GS&Co sales representative forwarded the marketing materials to IKB, explaining via email: “Attached are details of the ACA trade we spoke about with Fabrice [Toune] in which you thought the AAAs would be interesting”.

57. Tourre maintained direct and indirect contact with IKB in an effort to close the deal. This included a March 6, 2007 email to the GS&Co sales representative for IKB representing that:

“This is a portfolio selected by ACA . . .”. Tourre subsequently described the portfolio in an intemal GS&Co email as having been “selected by ACA/Paulson”.

58. ABACUS 2007-AC1 closed on or about April 26, 2007. IKB bought $50 million worth of Class A-l notes at face value. The Class A-l Notes paid a variable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 85 basis points and were rated Aaa by Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and AAA by Standard & Poor’s Ratings & Services (“S&P”). IKB bought $100 million worth of Class A-2 Notes at face value. The Class A-2 Notes paid a variable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 110 basis points and were rated Aaa by Moody’s and AAA by S&P.

59. The fact that the portfolio had been selected by an independent third-party with experience and economic interests aligned with CDO investors was important to IKB. IKB would not have invested in the transaction had it known that Paulson played a significant role in the collateral selection process while intending to take a short position in ABACUS 2007- AC1. Among other things, the knowledge of Paulson’s role would have seriously undermined IKB’s confidence in the portfolio selection process and led senior IKB personnel to oppose the transaction.

60. Within months of closing, ABACUS 2007-AC1’s Class A-l and A-2 Notes were nearly worthless. IKB lost almost all of its $150 million investment. Most of this money was ultimately paid to Paulson in a series of transactions between GS&Co and Paulson.

2. ACA/ABN AMRO

61. ACA’s parent company, ACA Capital Holdings, Inc. ( “ACA Capital”), provided financial guaranty insurance on a variety of structured finance products including RMBS CDOs, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation. On or about May 31, 2007, ACA Capital sold protection or “wrapped” the $909 million super senior tranche of ABACUS 2007-AC1, meaning that it assumed the credit risk associated with that portion of the capital structure via a CDS in exchange for premium payments of approximately 50 basis points per year.

62. ACA Capital was unaware of Paulson’s short position in the transaction. It is unlikely that ACA Capital would have written protection on the super senior tranche if it had known that Paulson, which played an influential role in selecting the reference portfolio, had taken a significant short position instead of a long equity stake in ABACUS 2007-ACL.

63. The super senior transaction with ACA Capital was intermediated by ABN AMRO Bank N.V(“ABN”), which was one of the largest banks in Europe during the relevant period.

This meant that, through a series of CDS between ABN and Goldman and between ABN and ACA that netted ABN premium payments of approximately 17 basis points per year, ABN assumed the credit risk associated with the super senior portion of ABACUS 2007-AC1’s capital structure in the event ACA Capital was unable to pay.

64. GS&Co sent ABN copies of the ABACUS 2007-AC1 term sheet, flipbook and offering memorandum, all of which represented that the RMBS portfolio had been selected by ACA and omitted any reference to Paulson’s role in the collateral selection process and its adverse economic interest. Tourre also told ABN in emails that ACA had selected the portfolio. These representations and omissions were materially false and misleading because, unbeknownst to ABN, Paulson played a significant role in the collateral selection process and had a financial interest in the transaction that was adverse to ACA Capital and ABN.

65. At the end of 2007, ACA Capital was experiencing severe financial difficulties.

In early 2008, ACA Capital entered into a global settlement agreement with its counterparties to effectively unwind approximately $69 billion worth of CDSs, approximately $26 billion of which were related to 2005-06 vintage subprime RMBS. ACA Capital is currently operating as a run-off financial guaranty insurance company.

66. In late 2007, ABN was acquired by a consortium of banks that included the Royal Bank of Scotland (“RBS”). On or about August 7, 2008, Royal Bank of Scotland unwound ABN’s super senior position in ABACUS 2007-AC1 by paying GS&Co $840,909,090. Most of this money was subsequently paid by GS&Co to Paulson.

CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

FIRST CLAIM I

Section 17(a) of the Securities Act

Paragraphs l-66 are realleged and incorporated herein by reference.

68. GS&Co and Tourre each violated Section l7(a)(1), (2) and (3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(1), (2) & (3)].

69. As set forth above, Goldman and Tourre, in the offer or sale of securities or securities-based swap agreements, by the use of means or instruments of interstate comrnerce or by the mails, directly or indirectly (a) employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud; (b) obtained money or property by means of untrue statements of material facts or omissions of material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) engaged in transactions, practices or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon purchasers of securities.

70. GS&Co and Tourre knowingly, recklessly or negligently misrepresented in the term sheet, flipbook and offering memorandum for ABACUS 2007-AC1 that the reference portfolio was selected by ACA without disclosing the significant role in the portfolio selection process played by Paulson, a hedge fund with financial interests in the transaction directly adverse to IKB, ACA Capital and ABN. GS&Co and Tourre also knowingly, recklessly or negligently misled ACA into believing that Paulson invested in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1 and, accordingly, that Paulson & Co.’s interests in the collateral section process were closely aligned with ACA’s when in reality their interests were sharply conflicting.

SECOND CLAIM

Section 10(b) and Rule 10-b(5) of the Exchange Act

71. Paragraphs 1-70 are realleged and incorporated herein by reference.

72. GS&Co and Tourre each violated Section l0(b) of the Exchange Act [5 U.S.C § 78j&)l and Rule l0b-5 [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5].

73. As set forth above, GS&Co and Tourre, in connection with the purchase or sale of securities or securities-based swap agreements, by the use of means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce or of the mails, directly or indirectly (a) employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud; (b) made untrue statements of material facts or omissions of material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) engaged in transactions, practices or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon persons.

74. GS&Co and Tourre knowingly or recklessly misrepresented in the term sheet flip book and offering memorandum for ABACUS 2007-ACl that the reference portfolio was selected by ACA without disclosing the significant role in the portfolio selection process played by Paulson, a hedge fund with financial interests in the transaction adverse to IKB, ACA Capital and ABN. GS&Co and Tourre also knowingly or recklessly misled ACA into believing that Paulson invested in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1 and, accordingly, that Paulson’s interests in the collateral section process were closely aligned with ACA’s when in reality their interests were sharply conflicting.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court enter a judgment:

A. Finding that GS&Co and Tourre each violated the Federal securities laws and the Commission rule alleged in this Complaint;

B. Permanently restraining and enjoining GS&Co and Tourre from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77q(a)], Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [1s U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Exchange Act Rule l0b-5 [17 C.F.R § 240.10b-5];

C. Ordering GS&Co and Tourre to disgorge all illegal profits that they obtained as a result of their fraudulent misconduct, acts or courses of conduct described in this Complaint, and to pay prejudgment interest thereon;

D. Imposing civil monetary penalties on GS&Co and Tourre pursuant to Section 20(d)(2) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t (d)(2)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [l5 U.S.C. §78u(d)(3)]; and:

E. Granting such equitable relief as may be appropriate or necessary for the benefit of investors pursuant to Section 2l(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [5 U.S.C. §78u(d)(5)].

Dated: Washington, D.C.

April 16,2010

Respectfully submitted [signed]

Andrew M. Calamari (AC-4864) Richard E. Simpson (RS 5859) Reid A. Muoio (RM 2274)

Kenneth Lench Cheryl J. Scarboro James A. Kidney Jeffrey Tao Jason Anthony Nicole C. Kelly Jeff Leasure

Securities and Exchange Commission IOO F St., NE Washington, D.C. 20549-4010
(202) 551-4492 (Simpson) simpsonr@sec.gov
LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:
• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:
• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.
• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.
• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:
• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.
• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:
• NASD Rule 3120, et al.

• NASD Rule 2330, et al

• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040

• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1

• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1

• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110

• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4

• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210

• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330

• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5

• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:
• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act

• Anti-Drug Abuse Act

• Applicable international money laundering restrictions

• Bank Secrecy Act

• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]

• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act

• Economic Espionage Act

• Hobbs Act

• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]

• Maloney Act

• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)

• Money-Laundering Control Act

• Money-Laundering Suppression Act

• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970

• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States

• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]

• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]

• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]

• Securities Act 1933

• Securities Act 1934

• Terrorism Prevention Act

• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

.

to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide

Posted in Christopher STORY, Edward Harle, Global Reports, IN MEMORIAM - Christopher STORY | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »