Christopher STORY his work & more

This page is a tribute to his work & will increasingly carry the full archive, as he authorised me to do before his death, LINKS may not function but will be updated where possible..

Posts Tagged ‘European Commission’

ENDEMIC CORRUPTION IN BRUSSELS AND HALLIBURTON

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 02/05/2010

ENDEMIC CORRUPTION IN BRUSSELS AND HALLIBURTON

.

ENDEMIC CORRUPTION IN BRUSSELS AND HALLIBURTON WHAT HAVE THEY GOT IN COMMON? BOTH ARE INSTITUTIONALLY PUTRID AND BEYOND REDEMPTION: NEW UNDERWORLD DISORDER DENS OF INIQUITY Sunday 2 May 2010 00:01 •

The Add-ons and Updates posted at the top of this report have now been migrated to the foot of the report. That does not mean they are less relevant than they were [see below].

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
• GOVERNMENT TRANSFERS OF VAT RECEIPTS TO BRUSSELS ARE ILLEGAL
• ‘CLEAN UP YOUR ACCOUNTS TO OUR COMPLETE SATISFACTION WITHIN ONE YEAR, OR WE KEEP THE LOT’
• OBSCENE TO PAY MONEY ILLEGALLY TO BRUSSELS WHEN BRITAIN IS BUST

THE GULF OF MEXICO OIL PLATFORM EXPLOSION: CEMENT CASING THAT BLEW WAS INSTALLED BY HALLIBURTON : MORE U.S./DVD SABOTAGE AGAINST THE BRITISH? YES… SEE UPDATE

EXPOSURE OF HALLIBURTON’S SCAMMING OPERATIONS: 26 MAY 2008
• THE HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG AND THE STOLEN FEDERAL SALARIES SCAM
• WHAT THE FBI FOUND IN THE CIA-HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG’S APARTMENT
• MULTIPLE SALARIES PAID INTO SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS
• HALLIBURTON’S THIEVES INSIDE THE CIA AND THE INEVITABLE CONSEQEUENCES
• TENET AND CHENEY REFUSED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES
• CHENEY WAS INFORMED IN A RECORDED PHONE CALL
• COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATION AGAINST TENET AND CHENEY BACKFIRES
• OVER 50% OF HALLIBURTON SALES BREACHED NATIONAL SECURITY
• THEFTS OF CIA COMPUTERS LEADING TO AN UNIMAGINABLE CATASTROPHE
• HALLIBURTON CROOK BRAGGED ABOUT LUCRATIVE SALE TO THE RUSSIANS
• THE CATASTROPHE, COURTESY OF THE CORRUPTION OF TENET, CHENEY AND BUSH
• DEATHS DUE TO THE STEALING OF A CIA COMPUTER
• ENTER THE ‘DARK LORDS’: DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO BUSH ‘CHENEY & BUSH TOOK THE MONEY FOR THE COMPUTERS USED FOR THE MURDERS’
• BUSH AND CHENEY RESPONSIBLE FOR 168 CIA DEATHS, COVERED UP (HITHERTO)
• HALLIBURTON LINKED TO THESE MURDERS OF CIA PERSONNEL
• CIA INVESTIGATOR TOLD TO ‘BACK OFF, OR ELSE’
• BIO-FEEDBACK EQUIPMENT STOLEN BY HALLIBURTON FOR THE RUSSIANS
• CHENEY THREATENS TO KILL THE VETERAN CIA OPERATIVE PERSONALLY

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: ‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.
• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.
• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.
• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.
• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.
• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS: Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010] Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx): SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C. You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.
• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.
NEW REPORT STARTS HERE: NEW: LETTER FROM VIENNA [5TH MAY] ADDED AT FOOT OF THIS SEGMENT.

VIDEOS OF THE EDITOR’S SPEECH IN LONDON ON 31ST OCTOBER 2009 We append below the links to the videos of the Editor’s speech. The Editor had no idea that his speech was being filmed, and neither was he aware that it was rebroadcast on BBC-5 on the 14th November 2009. We didn’t post this earlier because the Editor isn’t in the business of emulating Peacock Obama. But a malicious distorted image of the Editor is repeatedly shown on a notorious US controlled ‘Black’ intel Brit-hating disinformation website, which scandalously pumps out dirty, clumsy and fabricated anti-British ‘Black’ propaganda and lies worse than anything experienced from the Soviets at the height of the Cold War: so by showing this speech (in which the Editor had something very important to say: see below) you will see that the Editor’s face doesn’t consist of a squashed nose, forty blemishes, ten bunions, horns and a forked tongue.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jug-W-DKcms http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB18PIYbSYw&;feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJyUKbmBeJs&;feature=related

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE The subject-matter of the speech was that since the European Commission’s accounts have not been APPROVED by the European Union Collective’s own Court of Auditors based in Luxembourg for 14 years, the European Commission is a criminal enterprise. This was specifically reconfirmed for us by an official at the Court of Auditors named Novaks, in person.

A senior official named Craig with the UK Serious Fraud Office confirmed separately that it is a criminal offence for taxpayers’ funds to be remitted into the hands of a criminal enterprise.

GOVERNMENT TRANSFERS OF VAT RECEIPTS TO BRUSSELS ARE ILLEGAL This being the case, the British and other EU ‘Member States” satrap Governments are knowingly engaged in the criminal act of illegally transferring UK taxpayers’ funds to a criminal enterprise, which in turn implies that VAT taxpayers can sue their Governments for the recovery of their funds which have been remitted contrary to the law into foreign criminal accounts.

The Editor recommends that (in the UK context: other EU satrap ‘Member States’ can do as they please), an IMMEDIATE STOP MUST BE ORDERED TO THIS OFFICIAL CRIMINAL PRACTICE and that 100% of UK VAT accruals be diverted FORTHWITH into a special Treasury account sine die.

‘CLEAN UP YOUR ACCOUNTS TO OUR COMPLETE SATISFACTION WITHIN ONE YEAR, OR WE KEEP THE LOT’ The European Commission should be told that the British authorities expect a total rehabilitation and clean-up of ALL EC accounts for the past 14 years to be implemented, accompanied by the necessary overdue criminal investigations and prosecutions, with the outcomes to be approved not only by the Court of Auditors but also to the complete satisfaction of the authorities in London; and that if this is not done within one calendar year of the Brussels Commission being so advised, all accumulated and future VAT receipts will be annexed to offset the colossal indebtedness of the British Government incurred under Gordon Brown’s incompetent tenure.

The advantage of this approach is that this will be a unilateral measure by the British Government, overriding all the convoluted Talmudic claptrap and diversionary self-serving, deliberately opaque verbiage routinely spewed out by the Eurocrats in order to erect a bureaucratic smokescreen to separate the Commission from meaningful scrutiny of its institutionalised criminality.

OBSCENE TO PAY MONEY ILLEGALLY TO BRUSSELS WHEN BRITAIN IS BUST More to the point, it is OBSCENE for the British authorities to be engaged in this criminal practice of transferring VAT receipts to Brussels when the Government’s finances are in TOTAL DISARRAY.

The fact that this CRIMINAL OFFICIAL BEHAVIOUR has continued notwithstanding Britain’s Brown-generated fiscal crisis is a scandal of monumental proportions, indicating that the UK bureaucratic and political establishments have taken leave of their senses, placing crass EUdolatry ahead of national economic and financial survival. THIS IS A TRULY MONSTROUS STATE OF AFFAIRS.

NEW: LETTER FROM VIENNA: 5TH MAY 2010: PAN-GERMANS IN THE BUNDESTAG LAMENT THE IMMINENT COLLAPSE OF THE LATEST VERSION OF THEIR CORRUPT PAN-EUROPA:

Our Vienna correspondent, Wolfgang Perthen, writes [with a few interpolations by the Editor]:

Dear Mr. Story,

I’m right now watching on German TV, a live broadcast from the floor of the German Bundestag.

In a formal “Regierungserklärung” in the face of the “Greek” and therefore all-European currency problem (and ahead of this Friday’s parliamentary vote on German financial support for Greece), Chancellor Angela Merkel (who is otherwise not too famous for clear statements) emphasised her willingness to solve the current crisis and to proceed on the path to further European integration as envisioned since the days of Adenauer (!!!).

EVEN AS THE E.U. ROOF IS CAVING IN, THE FORMER SECRETARY OF THE AGITATION AND PROPAGANDA DEPARTMENT OF THE YOUNG COMMUNISTS AT MARX-LENIN UNIVERSITY, IS RECOMMENDING NEW CONSTRUCTION! [Ed]. Merkel stated also that a European Union without its most powerful economy, Germany, would be unthinkable.

Opposition leader, Frank-Walter Steinmeier (SPD), even expressed the view that “Europe” is now going through the most severe crisis since the Treaties of Rome.

Yet, the only logical way out of the current dilemma (everywhere recommended by experienced economists anyway: see International Currency Review throughout the 1990s: Ed.), namely allowing Greece (and possibly Portugal, Spain, Ireland, and, who knows, Italy) out of the currency union so they can re-introduce their own currencies and thus be able to devalue (and accordingly prevent further contagion throughout the region) is precluded.The Euro is indeed a sacred cow.

As it represents (and all I’m able to grasp in this realm I attribute to the literature of Golitsyn and Story!) a key political symbol of anti-national political union, NO MATTER HOW DEEP THE CRISIS, they won’t allow a single country out of the failing currency system, as this would send “the wrong signal”…. Accordingly, the entire spectrum of the peoples of Europe is now belatedly awakening to the reality that the EU is indeed (as you, Mr Story, have so extensively described) a POLITICAL COLLECTIVE: Together we stand, together we fall. ‘We’ve got to stick together, or we all go down: WHICH IS THE REVERSE OF THE TRUTH. GREECE, PORTUGAL, IRELAND, SPAIN NEED TO GET OUT OF THE COLLECTIVE CURRENCY, AS OUR JOURNAL REPEATEDLY PREDICTED: Ed..

As for Germany, the driving force of the Euro project, they now – quite predictably – prove to be the same old “Dummkopfs” (in proper German: Dummköpfe) as has always been the case. There seems to be an unrootable characteristic in the German national “psyche”, that believes it can MANAGE and CARRY (and, of course, dominate) everything. The Germans – however capable, ambitious, and perfectionist – seem to be the No. 1 nation consisting of “genetic” totalitarians in the world.

And they lack – as you frequently indicate – this snakish quality of a “higher intelligence”, call it Soviet-Russian, Mongol, or Jewish, that makes the DECISIVE difference in geopolitics. In that sense, the Germans, with all their self-esteem and claims of “responsible leadership”, in the end always lose. They tried, yet again, by stealth this time, to take over the whole of Europe: now the collective currency that they have forced upon almost everybody, is falling back on their heads.

Their role as a self-declared politico-economic locomotive, their arrogant load of “responsibility”, now turns out to be a curse for them (as in WW II). Strangely, if one listens to the speeches in the German Bundestag, they seem to be not so much worried about Germany (as every other country, naturally, is now concerned, first and foremost, about its own survival), BUT RATHER ABOUT THE PROSPECT THAT THEIR SACRED PAN-GERMAN HEGEMONY OVER EUROPE IS FALLING APART.

At the same time, while Germany’s nice and orderly Europe starts collapsing and social unrest and revolutionary pressure threatens to accumulate (certainly fuelled by the Moscow-controlled Fifth Column), the Soviets see their moment in history approaching.

Please do watch this coming Sunday’s (May 9) military parade on Red Square: they have prepared an even more impressive display of their military power than last year!

All the best to you, Sir, Sincerely, Wolfgang Perthen, Vienna

THE GULF OF MEXICO OIL PLATFORM EXPLOSION: CEMENT CASING THAT BLEW WAS INSTALLED BY HALLIBURTON : MORE U.S./DVD SABOTAGE AGAINST THE BRITISH? YES… Just as our suspicions from the outset over the Polish air catastrophe at Smolensk proved to be justified, so do we and many others smell a giant rat concerning the explosion and fire at the BP oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico. And the face of the rat bears an uncanny resemblance to the ugly physiognomy of George Bush Sr.
• UPDATE, 3RD MAY 2010: Anecdotal evidence is indeed emerging pointing to sabotage. The lack of the usual press-frenzy interviews with survivors is also suspicious. But the main reason that we suspect sabotage is that this operation has coincided with key developments behind the scenes involving the British which has severely inconvenienced the evil American criminal kleptocracy. Seen in that light, this is a blatant sabotage operation tantamount to an act of war against the UK perpetrated as a revenge attack for the basest of motives. Unfortunately at this juncture we can’t elaborate on what has been going on behind the scenes, but you can draw your own conclusions.

Further indications that this is a deliberate, malicious revenge operation against British interests (a very dangerous departure, if true, as there is such a phenomenon as ‘tit for tat’) are evident in the harsh, mafioso-style language emerging from the throats of US officials.

For instance, Mr Kenneth Salazar, US Interior Secretary (i.e., the ‘Minister of the Interior’) is reported as having stated on 2nd May: ‘Our job basically is to keep the boot on the neck of [BP] to carry out the responsibilities they have both under the law and contractually to move forward and stop this spill’, even though it was almost certrainly a consequence of a revenge sabotage and provocation operation perpetrated by disaffected rogue revolutionary cadres within the US structures working to the CIA/DVD agenda.

For starters, the cement casing that blew up was installed by the corrupt Cheney-CIA operation called Halliburton. Apparently this is the second time in a year that a Halliburton casing has failed catastrophically on an oil rig.

It may be recalled from our earlier coverage that Halliburton operates a huge parasitical buying and ordering department within the Central Intelligence Agency and a parallel parasitical department inside the Pentagon, and that both these entities scam the opposite host on a routine basis, at the expense of the US taxpayer. Whether this unbelievable duplicated CIA scandal was investigated and wound up after we and others exposed it [see report dated 26th May 2008, excerpted below: ARCHIVE], we don’t know. What we do recall is it became the subject of a Grand Jury investigation.

Horror stories associated with this colossal corruption op. included the faulty Halliburton gun manufactured in Saudi Arabia that routinely exploded and killed the gunner, which Halliburton continued selling long after the accidents in question (plus the despicably amoral cover-up of the reason for the gun operators’ deaths); and the notorious delivery of 1,000 toasters which could be bought for $19.99 at any hardware store, but which Halliburton invoiced to the Pentagon for $1,891 a piece, on the spurious pretext that they were manufactured from a special metal.

Now the oil rig that exploded in the Gulf of Mexico at 10:pm CST on 20th April 2010, was ‘Deepwater Horizon’ owned by Transocean Limited, based in Zug, Switzerland, with its principal office located in HOUSTON, Texas, and other offices in Zug and Vernier, Switzerland, and in George Town, Cayman Islands. Zug is where Marc Rich, real name HANS BRAND, the long-range Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) operative and East-West intermediary, is based.

The explosion occurred on the very same day that Transocean shares started trading in Europe, as is confirmed by the following Press Release dated 20th April 2010:

http://www.deepwater.com/fw/main/News-748.html?c=113031&;p=irol-news&nyo=0

‘ZUG, SWITZERLAND, Apr 20, 2010 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) — Transocean Ltd. (NYSE: RIG) (SIX: RIGN), the world’s largest offshore drilling contractor, announced that its shares will begin trading on SIX Swiss Exchange (“SIX”) today under the symbol (RIGN). Transocean’s shares also trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol (RIG)’.

Following this sabotage, Barack Obama reversed course on offshore drilling, BARELY THREE WEEKS after he had publicly announced a revised domestic energy policy lifting the longstanding moratorium on certain offshore drilling. Specifically, on 30th April 2010, the controlled US ‘State News Agency’ Associated Press reported:

‘A top adviser to President Barack Obama said Friday that no new oil drilling would be authorized until authorities learn what caused the explosion of the rig Deepwater Horizon. David Axelrod told ABC’s ‘Good Morning America’ that ‘no additional drilling has been authorized and none will until we find out what has happened here’. Obama recently lifted a drilling moratorium for many offshore areas, including the Atlantic and Gulf areas’.

‘The oil slick could become the nation’s worst environmental disaster in decades, threatening even the Exxon Valdez in scope’.

According to Reuters [25th April 2010]:

‘Swiss-based Transocean Ltd.’s Deepwater Horizon sank on Thursday, two days after it exploded and caught fire while finishing a well for BP Plc., 42 miles off the Louisiana coast.

Eleven workers from the rig are missing and presumed dead in what is the worst oil rig disaster in almost a decade. The Coast Guard on Friday suspended a search for the workers.

London-based BP, which is financially responsible for the cleanup, has deployed an armada of ships and aircraft to contain the oil slick.

The explosion came almost three weeks after President Barack Obama unveiled plans for a limited expansion of US offshore oil and gas drilling…. The explosion occurred as the rig was capping a discovery well pending production, company officials said. Some 115 of the 126 workers on board at the time of the explosion were rescued’.
• HOWEVER:
• The ‘Deepwater Horizon’ operation received a safety award in 2009.
• Has British Petroleum at last realised that it is just as hazardous to do business adjacent to US waters as it is to do business in the Soviet Union?

If BP had had the wit to subscribe to Soviet Analyst years ago, we could have informed them that a primary purpose, from the Soviet perspective, of enticing foreign oil corporations into the ‘former’ USSR was to procure the necessary transfer of technology into Soviet hands, before the GRU-KGB-controlled ‘oligarchs’ would squeeze the Western operators out.
• The Americans similarly use sabotage to destabilise the foreign competition.
• As you can see, there is more than a passing indication that this sabotage may be a desperate Bush Crime Syndicate-related (i.e., DVD) operation, with the non-coincidental ‘happy’ outcome that British Petroleum, sabotaged again, bleeds financially.
• In other words, yet another typically hardnosed US kick in the teeth for the Brits, not unassociated, we suspect, with concurrent forceful financial developments in the background.
EXPOSURE OF HALLIBURTON’S SCAMMING OPERATIONS: 26 MAY 2008 The following description of the pit of corrupt degradation known as Halliburton is excerpted from our report dated 28th May 2008 [ARCHIVE]. It reflects the detailed inside knowledge of a fearless and serious-minded whistleblower. [Note: The narrative as partially reproduced here starts ‘out of context’. However you can pick up such context as is necessary to be in a position to comprehend the cess-pit of degradation that is being exposed, as you read into the excerpt]:

THE HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG AND THE STOLEN FEDERAL SALARIES SCAM A former top CIA aide to Tenet and 30-year CIA veteran now reveals the criminal background of ‘HallCIA’, the thug who yanked the officer’s phone from the wall, ransacked the CIA operative’s office, had the officer incarcerated in Halliburton’s own cell in the basement of CIA headquarters and on a separate occasion punched holes in the officer’s office wall, displayed episodes of extreme violence and was observed by many to be high on drugs. He was also a murderer….

This was the criminal whom Cheney asserted to be a friend who could never be arrested. This description leads into a summary of another scam, whereby multiple salaries are paid into corrupt Halliburton employees’ secret Swiss bank accounts:

‘HallCIA’ and the Head Programmer were moved back to Halliburton’s main office, just like the priests sexually abusing children are moved to a different parish.

They were never prosecuted…

[Dressed in FBI uniform provided by Halliburton, the operative is engaged in an FBI action to arrest this Halliburton thug], He was arrested for FIRST DEGREE MURDER OF AN FBI OFFICER. I had proof that the FBI officer that he had murdered was a bona fide one with proper papers and vetting in the FBI’s personnel archives. The FBI had fingerprint and DNA evidence to prove that the Halliburton programmer was the murderer.

They even had a trial and a conviction of the man for that murder.

He had feigned a fainting episode right before the reading of the sentence and been taken to a hospital. He then assaulted the hospital guard inside his room and left him unconscious in his bed. Then he impersonated the guard using his uniform. He later went to a lawyer who put in a motion to declare the trial a mistrial on the grounds of a technicality: the defendant had not been present at the reading of the sentence. The fact that the criminal had committed a second nearly deadly assault the same day in apparent good health, was omitted from that motion.

The FBI-clandestine CIA raid that I organized was on the private flat of ‘HallCIA’. It was not at his house where he lived with a prostitute whom he pimped, according to a CIA file. He did not keep his contraband items there as there were too many unsavory people coming through his house.

WHAT THE FBI FOUND IN THE CIA-HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG’S APARTMENT At the flat the FBI confiscated drugs in pusher quantities and also illegal weapons, including some unregistered machine guns, explosives and hand-held artillery that could blow big holes through a wall for illegal entry. He had one bedroom devoted just to weapons, with shelves devoted to about half-kilo packages of drugs. It was equipped with a padlock. CIA top secret documents were strewn all over the bed, dresser and floor of the master bedroom.

It looked like a hurricane had hit the bedroom even before we arrived. The padlock was broken on the door to the weapons and drug room and the door was open when we arrived. But all the drugs were still neatly on the shelves. The flat may have been raided by Russian intelligence before we arrived, leaving the CIA documents behind as cover-up after copying them.

The FBI collected fingerprints and I collected the CIA documents. After the raid I returned to the FBI station and filled in the appropriate forms to write a FBI report up on the raid. As I was doing so, the two FBI officers who I had spoken with two days before walked by the desk I was using. They did a double take seeing me in the FBI uniform…. I told them that I had just tested FBI vetting and security procedures for a report I was writing for the CIA. I also explained to them that I had just successfully impersonated an FBI official to the extent of going on a raid with them, and not one had yet asked for my name or run it through a background check. I showed them the CIA top-secret documents the raid had netted and they laughed at the ruse I had played on the FBI.

They were not laughing, however, when I explained how I had gotten that FBI uniform and signed the papers. They checked on their computers; I was not yet registered on the records of the FBI.

I asked them to arrest all of the appropriate Halliburton people involved in that scam. They called the Director of the FBI and I also spoke to him. He refused to authorize the arrests.

He told me: ‘Write up your report and let me read it first’. I offered to drive over immediately with the evidence. He refused to make any time to see me. I immediately faxed him a short report and enough evidence to warrant the arrests. Nothing happened.

MULTIPLE SALARIES PAID INTO SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS But the next day when the local FBI checked my name again, they called me to let me know that I was officially part of the FBI now per their computer. I promptly sent in a full report to the FBI, the CIA, and the Pentagon on this scam to sign up Halliburton employees as their officers and have the US taxpayer pay their salaries. Just like Halliburton over-billed, some Halliburton employees were collecting THREE US Government salaries; one from the Pentagon, one from the FBI, and one from the CIA. I wrote in my report that I had signed up in all three places via Halliburton’s scam to see how long it would be before those scams were stopped.

I put on the three forms, separate Swiss bank accounts. The point was to use the accounts as evidence of Halliburton corruption when those cases came to trial; I have not touched a cent of that money. The Directors of the FBI, the CIA, and the Chief of the JCS that I sent those reports to did not implement my list of recommendations; one of them was to shut down all of those public salaries going to Halliburton employees. At least, they had not been implemented as of about Summer 2004 when I last checked those accounts.

Another recommendation was to make sure that everyone in those agencies is properly vetted and drug tested as per that agency’s usual security measures. Because I was concerned that my clear recommendations would not be acted upon, I despatched copies of those letters, the forms that I had signed, and the numbers of the Swiss bank accounts to the GAO. In my covering letter to the GAO I told them that I had given them the authority to check the balances in those accounts by written authorization to the Swiss bank.

I had hoped that seeing US taxpayer’s money streaming into those accounts would give them an incentive to prosecute those cases promptly. Since the banks were not in the United States, I doubt that coercion applied to the bankers will erase those accounts, but I could be wrong. Since I had long been a covert CIA person, those communications with officials and the banks were under aliases. The GAO however has all of the proper information to check those accounts again and to prosecute these cases. I myself no longer remember any of the aliases and account numbers, so I couldn’t access that money even if I wanted to. I never intended to use that money at all, so I did not record those aliases and numbers into my personal effects.

In 2004 when I checked the accounts, I did so from within the CIA by pulling up the report that I had written to the DCI. I have no way to check those accounts now so I do not know whether that scam, as evidenced by a single person’s accounts, has been stopped. When I checked in 2004, two years had already passed. The US taxpayer had paid [as follows]: via the CIA, about $80,000.00 each year, for a total of about $160,000.00; via the FBI, about $50,000.00 each year, for a total of $100,000.00; and via the Pentagon, about $80,000.00 each year for a total of about $160,000.00, or roughly $420,000.00 total into those three Swiss accounts…

I also checked on whether Halliburton continued paying those employees if it signed them up for a Federal salary. The answer was no, except for rare exceptions. ‘HallCIA’ had continued receiving a Halliburton salary while getting one at the CIA, but the Head Programmer had not.

When I checked in 2004 the number of Halliburton employees getting a CIA salary was over 200, the number receiving an FBI salary was over 400, and the number of Halliburton employees receiving a Pentagon salary, was over 300. Suppose that the total for that is about 1,000 salaries each at, say, $50,000 a year. That would mean that the US taxpayer was being bilked (by Cheney) of $50 million a year of fraudulent salaries. Over the eight years that this Cheney has been in the Vice President’s office, that could easily add up to $400 million in savings for Halliburton in not having had to to pay salaries. No wonder it was so easy to get that FBI uniform and salary sent out to me by talking to a Halliburton VP. Other Halliburton programmers had complained to me that they took a ‘cut in pay’ to work at the CIA location. They said that ‘the takings are good’, and ‘Halliburton fences the items for us in a 50-50 split’.

HALLIBURTON’S THIEVES INSIDE THE CIA AND THE INEVITABLE CONSEQEUENCES When I heard that Halliburton’s people were stealing from inside the halls of the CIA, loud alarm bells went off inside my head. The items inside the CIA which were easiest to carry out were of course its documents.

And any computer that one stole inside the CIA was likely to have top-secret information on it, in spades. It was a counterintelligence person’s nightmare, and now it was mine. The fact that the Head of the Halliburton section offices at the CIA had just sold the CIA’s communication satellite encryption security codes to Moscow burned in my mind.

The Russians had paid him $20,000 for that betrayal.

He had no clue as to their black market value. It made me worry that the Russians and the Chinese could buy every secret inside the CIA for a price that they could afford. More than one Halliburton person inside the CIA had admitted to me that they were stealing to make up for their cut in pay. Halliburton had switched them to Federal salaries, making the CIA pick up the tab [see above].

One Halliburton person at the CIA had told me that they were all stealing enough to make up for that cut in pay. [They were ONLY in it for the money: taking their cue from Cheney and Bush: Ed].

Therefore, the first thing I did was to find out what those 40-odd people used to earn at Halliburton. I had the CIA’s accounting office print out for me what the CIA was now paying them. My mouth then dropped open in shock. Each one of them would have to steal over $10,000 worth of CIA secrets or goods a year to break even. In some cases the cut in pay was much higher. One man took a $50,000 a year cut in pay when he switched to the Federal salary. At the average $23,000 cut in pay, the 40 workers together had sustained a $920,000 cut in pay. I had been told that Halliburton was fencing the goods in a 50%-50% split. So, about 2 million dollars’ worth of good at black market prices would be stolen from the CIA, if they actually made up their lost salaries stealing.

[There followed a summary of the notorious Aldrich Ames, Clyde Conrad, Larry Wu-Tai Chin, John Anthony Walker, and Robert Hanssen espionage cases, omitted here]

On February 22, 1994, Ames and his wife were formally charged by the United States Department of Justice with spying for the Soviet Union and Russia. Mr Ames could have faced the death penalty, since his betrayal had resulted in CIA ‘assets’ being killed. However, he received a sentence of life imprisonment, and his wife received only a five-year prison sentence for her conspiracy to commit espionage and tax evasion as part of a plea bargain by Ames.

TENET AND CHENEY REFUSED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES I walked down to the office a very high-ranking CIA analyst, about third in the hierarchy in that department, a man I trusted. People advance inside the CIA by one of two means normally, being very good at what they do or being very good at lying to please those above them. The heads of each section were often in the latter category, as a general rule. I asked him how many secrets the Russians could buy for $2 million a year, if they had 40 moles able to walk the halls of the CIA. In the posing of the question I explained that the hypothetical moles would be assumed to be ‘efficient’ criminals without formal espionage training. I asked him what effect that would have on national security. He asked me if this was a conversational gambit or a request for a formal report to answer my question. I thought about it a moment and then said the latter.

That meant that I had to go get a signature on a form. By submitting to Mr Tenet new requests for 10 separate reports on a wide variety of important topics, I quickly brought the analyst the signed form that he needed. He whistled in surprise when he reviewed the assignment given to him there in black and white. Then he asked me ‘Is this about the Privatized Employees’ invasion of the CIA?’ I said yes. He said: ‘I have been urging Tenet to let us study that risk for months. No go. How did you get this when I couldn’t?’

I explained to him my method and also that the Head of the Halliburton group had just sold the CIA’s Communication Satellite Encryption Security Codes to the Russians.

He hadn’t heard that [because] Tenet had put a lid on it even within the CIA. I promised to show him the proof. I came back and gave him and a few of his top staff an hour long briefing on what I had learned. One man was actually in tears as I finished.

Another said: ‘This marks the end of US national security’. Another said, ‘No. US honor died already and no memo was sent announcing its funeral’.

I asked them what information they needed to make a proper assessment. They said that it would help them if I could find out how much the 40 people were actually making off their thefts inside the CIA, and a list of what they were stealing. I came back the next day with the list of how much each one had been paid by Halliburton in ‘bonuses’, which was the code word for fenced items, and what each ‘bonus’ was for. That list of what each bonus was for was like what the programmers really did in morphing an appliance rack into a bread slice rack. It was not a specifically accurate description but it related to the item in a fairly straightforward way.

CHENEY WAS INFORMED IN A RECORDED PHONE CALL I showed the list to Tenet and tried to brief him on how dangerous it was.

He did not want to hear. Tenet had not followed my recommendations, which would have stopped the thefts. And he did not want further reasons why he should do so… I called Cheney and begged him to send a memo over to Halliburton setting up a program to [address these extremely serious issues]. I even faxed him a memo so that all he had to do was sign to get that to happen. He did not deny that Halliburton was selling items stolen from the CIA. He did not deny that he had the power to impose the necessary changes at Halliburton by sending the memo. He did not deny that he had the power to order Tenet to institute effective measures to stem the tide of the thefts.

As the phone recording of that call shows, I kept briefing him on the problem while he kept saying that he refused to discuss the matter with me.

I sent a copy of that call over to the GAO because it showed that I had in fact managed to inform Vice President Cheney of the seriousness of the thefts. In that call [to Cheney] I cited that the likely consequences were the shredding of US national security and the wholly unnecessary deaths of its covert personnel. I also set up a surveillance operation behind Cheney’s and Tenet’s back to actually inspect each item that Halliburton fenced from the CIA.

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATION AGAINST TENET AND CHENEY BACKFIRES That is, I had an ex-CIA operative with counter-intelligence experience whom I trusted, apply to Halliburton. I instructed him to offer to ‘help them fence their CIA goods and get higher prices for them’. Call him Alan for short. A Halliburton VP, the same one who sent me the FBI uniform, sent me a ‘thank you’ letter for referring Alan to them. He no doubt believed that I was corrupt and making a kickback. It was to my advantage to foster that image of myself without it actually being true. In my position it was best if everything I did could be interpreted as corrupt at the same time that I was collecting the evidence for prosecution.

That operative, Alan, ended up terribly overworked in no time. The analysts and I had been off by a factor of THREE in the amount that was routinely being stolen by Halliburton from the CIA.

We did not find that out until the Halliburton people realized that they could get more money by making sure that Alan sold the goods for them. That meant Alan had to sell them at on average much higher than twice what they could get for them themselves, even by selling directly to the Russians. That was not as hard as it would have been with regular stolen goods; the Halliburton people did not know their true worth on the black market. Alan could make a better profit selling a document to a rich government such as France, which would have been very bad in the hands of the poorer Chinese or Russians. Before that, Halliburton had sold mainly to the Russians. [Editor: Further allegation that Halliburton has sold CIA secrets to the Russians].

The French were very helpful to us in keeping many things out of the hands of the Russians. They had wised up quickly as to our problem and how to assist us. The United Kingdom was less helpful because they could get that same information by merely filing a request for it.

The French were not as tight into the CIA, though they were still US allies. We needed top dollar for the stolen items because we had to make up for the fact that we were not selling off all of the items due to their national security risk. We were hiding the fact from Halliburton’s management that we were really sending the items back to the CIA.

OVER 50% OF HALLIBURTON SALES BREACHED NATIONAL SECURITY We could not send computers back, as it was impossible to ensure that the Russians etc. had not altered them in the meantime. Those had to be scrubbed clean using a special erasing procedure. But it was possible to send back documents. We had initially thought that it would be only 10% of the items that had to be vetoed on national security grounds. But as we got a better understanding of what was being sold via Halliburton, that figure went up to a little over 50%

[Editor: More damning allegations against Halliburton as a continuing threat to US national security, for which Cheney should be impeached, along with Bush Jr., who authorised this corruption via his Executive Orders].

[The high-level operative and source for this information left the CIA for Canada in 2002].

Subsequently, operatives working inside the CIA to address this catastrophic situation] demanded that Tenet should lock the unvetted people out of the building.

In the process of showing how serious the security violations were, they revealed the oversight (or counterintelligence) operation against Tenet and Cheney themselves. That ended up revealing that they were recovering about 50% of the items and about 30% of their black market worth. Tenet informed Cheney of that fact, and Cheney ordered an end to the oversight.

I later sent copies of the relevant telephone calls revealing all this to the GAO. The Russians and Mossad had a complete set of White House calls, including of [calls concerning what was] for sale. The CIA also had a fairly complete set. When I was forced back into the CIA in October 2003 from Canada with threats and worse, I heard about the troubles that the oversight people had suffered over the intervening 16 months. They had been unable to perform oversight for four months.

During that time Halliburton had fired their Private Eyes, the ex-CIA operatives that they had there. Instead, Halliburton had hired its own experts on Black Market Intelligence Pricing and had sold all of the stolen items without regard to US national security. I then despatched over to the GAO about a dozen phone conversations by Halliburton’s high officials demonstrating their reckless disregard for national security and the lives of covert operatives. [Therefore, this information is all available for the Congressional Committee to access immediately: Editor].

But it now gets much, much worse….

THEFTS OF CIA COMPUTERS LEADING TO AN UNIMAGINABLE CATASTROPHE The next part of the narrative briefing leads into a description of the most ghastly consequences, for which Vice President Richard B. Cheney is clearly indicated by the narrative to be responsible, given his Luciferian greed for ‘profit’ which of course is on its own an impeachable offence:

It was only after a [hitherto unreported: Ed.] colossal national security catastrophe that the [CIA operatives who had carried on trying to get results] managed to get Tenet to insist that Halliburton rehire their ex-CIA ‘Private Eyes’. The oversight people briefed me on [the catastrophe] as soon as I returned. The first day I came back to the CIA’s Headquarters, they kept me up all night telling me about it. I cried many times that night for my country and for the harm that had been done to her. I cried for the people who had died so brutally and unnecessarily.

Many, many more intelligence professionals lost their lives as a consequence of Cheney’s selling secrets than lost their lives because of the traitorous behaviour of Aldrich Ames. Ames is serving a life sentence for what he did. Cheney’s Halliburton people were still working at the CIA and were still stealing there because of Cheney’s protection of them. They were still walking inside the halls of the CIA every day and going into its offices to ‘have a chat’.

It was such an egregious violation of national security that some oversight members quit the CIA. Others said to me: ‘Why should we look like criminals who are enabling this theft’? ‘We are not making a cent off it… Yet we have been threatened by Tenet that we will be put in prison because we know of the thefts and hence must be guilty of them… We are being treated like criminals because we are trying to stop the most dangerous of these sales’.

[Editor: Gross abuse by Tenet of the Misprision of Felony Statute].

I later collected a memo from Cheney to Tenet which stated that the oversight of the sales by the CIA was cutting into profits and had to be stopped. It recommended imprisoning all of those in the CIA suspected of being a bottleneck in [the raking in of] US corporate profits. Tenet prohibited the oversight within a week of receiving that memo. The GAO has a copy of the memo and also of the memo that Tenet sent out threatening imprisonment if anyone was discovered to have decreased US corporate profits. They also have the later memorandum that Mr Tenet sent, which threatened imprisonment if anyone knew about stolen goods and did not report it to the designated official.

Those who had reported thefts to that official had been fired soon afterwards.

Thieves do not report stolen goods; people with integrity do, until it is clear that it is pointless and dangerous to do so. I also sent the GAO the document suggesting this ruse of a new designated official as a way to stop the oversight. That designated official never prosecuted a case of theft against a Halliburton person. He came from Halliburton! He had in fact been recommended for the job by ‘HallCIA’ to Cheney, who then recommended him for the job. I sent over to the GAO a tape of the phone conversation between ‘HallCIA’ and Cheney. On it. ‘HallCIA’ says that the man that he is recommending will stop the losses of revenues ‘from our CIA sales’.

HALLIBURTON CROOK BRAGGED ABOUT LUCRATIVE SALE TO THE RUSSIANS Later he bragged about one of his sales to Russia of ‘one of our CIA products’, and says, ‘too bad we can’t make more of them’. It was clear that he was referring to the stolen goods that Halliburton stole from the CIA, not products that Halliburton made and sold to the CIA. The designated official was not vetted by the CIA. He was stealing from the CIA while working out of the Halliburton offices. I sent to the GAO a signed statement from a CIA security guard who caught him carrying a computer of the CIA’s out of the front door. That man could have employed the back door out of their offices manned only by Halliburton’s guards. He was so used to stealing from the CIA and getting away with it that he forgot, and used the front door.

That is what he told the guard: ‘I forgot… Give me a hand and we’ll take it out the back door’. The Halliburton guards did just that. They helped the Halliburton thieves load CIA computers into their private cars. I sent the GAO several CIA security camera clips of that happening.

The CIA had massive amounts of security camera data showing that [activity]. The CIA security people were afraid to report the thefts that they saw, because they did not want to lose their jobs without it even cleaning up the problem. By the time I returned to the CIA, 16 people had lost their jobs due to reporting thefts to the designated official that Tenet’s memo had directed them to use. No one at the CIA knew about the item sold during the blackout that caused the national security catastrophe, until after the catastrophe happened. [Details of this national security catastrophe, unfortunately containing graphic and disturbing language, now follow].

THE CATASTROPHE, COURTESY OF THE CORRUPTION OF TENET, CHENEY AND BUSH The first sign of that Catastrophe [with a capital C: Ed] was a dead body lying on a sidewalk in a foreign city. The body had been the teenage daughter of a CIA officer. The body was no longer recognizable, even by her father. The body was identified definitively by dental records. Her face had been peeled off in small strips. The forensic evidence revealed that she was still able to bleed and struggle during most of the time that was done to her.

The next sign of the Catastrophe was another unrecognizable body. This time, of a 6-year-old boy of a US diplomat. The injuries were the same. The CIA concluded that the murderer was the same man. The next sign was an 11-year-old child of a US school teacher in Africa. She was divorced and her husband had once worked for the US State Department. Perhaps he had been CIA under diplomatic cover, but the CIA refused to comment.

I saw the photographs of the dead bodies. They were too horrible for words. Could it be that I was recalled to the CIA against my will in order to get my special operational skills to track down the villain? The day I got back to the CIA, the first thing Tenet did was hand me these pictures and ask me to find The Killer. He had given me the pictures of 23 victims who had all died the same way. All of them were children of people who could have been in the CIA. About 22 of them did have a known parent or guardian in the CIA.

DEATHS DUE TO THE STEALING OF A CIA COMPUTER What he failed to tell me, or give me the photos for, for was the over 100 adults that had been killed using the exact same modus operandi. One of them was in the CIA’s morgue at that moment [Editor: did you know that the CIA has its own morgue? I didn’t]. ..The item that was stolen from the CIA that was responsible for those deaths was a computer. That computer had not gone through the hands of one of the ex-CIA operatives. Its contents not been thoroughly erased.

It took work and time to do that; the disc had to be erased and written over 50 times. Halliburton’s bosses did not care about national security or the risk to the CIA’s covert operatives, if they were exposed… I was able to prove that it was the same computer. It still had the CIA’s personnel files on it and many of the victims had been selectively deleted from where they should have been in that list. When I then compared that file to the CIA’s current personnel file, the comparison program marked those deletions in red. The selective deletions showed that the owner of the computer was getting tipped off by someone high up in the investigation of the deaths inside the CIA.

The US Administration managed to suppress the news of these murders almost completely, after its ties to the computer started showing up in the CIA’s internal investigations. No-one in the media had connected the isolated cases across the globe [another gross failure by the incompetent and controlled Fourth Estate, which has intelligence cadres sitting in its press rooms: Ed.].

The motivation of the deletions was obviously to try to cover-up the guilt of the owner’s role in those murders. There were about 86 deletions in a file of thousands of names. Each deletion was a victim, as already known by the CIA up to a certain date about two weeks earlier.

ENTER THE ‘DARK LORDS’: DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO BUSH No victim that the CIA had on its investigation list by that point had failed to be deleted on that stolen computer. The odds of that happening by chance alone was practically speaking, exactly zero. In addition, I later obtained evidence that firmly tied the secondary ownership of that same computer to those who committed the actual tortures and murders. There was many more than one murderer. What they had in common was membership in a kind of paramilitary, quasi-religious cult. The members of that paramilitary cult had a group commitment to kill a person once a month. The Mafia usually only requires its members to kill once to get into it. This satanic group required their members to kill once a month in order to remain in good standing in it.

[Note: The Editor of this service received, between February and mid-May 2008, a large number of evil, unsolicited phone calls from a contrived, deep demonic ‘voice’ referencing ‘the Great Dark Lords’. This harassment [referenced in our report dated 27th April 2010, as the stupid harassment resumed: we have identified the operative concerned as Wanta] continued until shortly after we reported the matter to the head of the US Anti-Terrorism Task Force and also, separately, to law enforcement personnel in contact with the Editor’s own contacts, whereupon they ceased. We have voice recordings of almost all these calls.

Considered in the context of what follows, it would appear that these calls represented threats: one of these was quite specific, along the lines of ‘we have the means of dealing with you’. Given the appearance of the ‘Dark Lords’ in this ‘Cheney’ context, it is likely that the Unterreichsführer’s apparat will indeed, as we suspected, have been responsible for these multiple telephone threats and harassment calls.

It comes as NO SURPRISE whatsoever to the Editor that the veteran CIA investigator came across this ‘Black’ dimension. The harassment calls to the Editor were also interspersed with threatening emails. The content of one of these, containing a very grave threat, was conveyed immediately as referenced above, with the consequence that (at the date of this posting) the harassment ceased].

A Manual on ‘How to Please the Lords of Darkness’ had been published by a member of that cult. It recommended that the best way to do it was to torture people to death using the modus operandi that I have indicated above. That Manual had been distributed by the owner of the aforementioned computer with that CIA Personnel file suggested as the targets. The man who bought the computer was indeed a paramilitary type, with a large collection of weapons, many of them unregistered… He was identified as a fundraiser for Bush.

The literature of the group showed upside-down crosses as an emblem [satanic symbolism: Ed.]. The reason that others in the CIA had not tracked him down and had failed to pin the instigating of the murders on him, was political. Like ‘HallCIA’, and the Head Programmer from our earlier cases, he was well protected. It was not that CIA investigators had not suspected him. It was that they did not know what to do with their suspicions and even their evidence after they got it.

I was the booby prize winner: the fool at the CIA who had before been willing to buck the silence at great risk to myself. There was precedence for giving me a job like this. At one point, a CIA officer had sold a list of MI6 officers to the KGB during the Cold War. The KBG had started killing them off. I was given the job to stop them from continuing. And they had stopped: whether or not it was due to my efforts, was a matter of hot debate within the CIA. But some people credited me with having had some influence in the matter.

The individual who bought that computer was apparently a friend of Cheney and Bush; they had invited him to the White House. They had been present when he picked it out among a number of other CIA stolen computers, paying cash, which Cheney had put in his pocket.

‘CHENEY & BUSH TOOK THE MONEY FOR THE COMPUTERS USED FOR THE MURDERS’ I found the White House Security camera footage of that event. The GAO has a copy of it. The payment is shown on the video. The man took hundred dollar bill(s) out of his pocket and handed that to Bush. Bush hesitated and then handed the money to Cheney. The footage of that computer being carried out of the room by a guard follows about 20 minutes later. The room had about 20 computers from the CIA in it, to start with. [They were all neatly laid out, as at a corporate sales demonstration, for buyers to examine, test, select, and pay for: only cash was accepted: Ed.].

The security camera tape shows Bush Jr. and Mr Cheney repeatedly coming into the room with a prospective buyer and taking cash in varying amounts. That continued until all the computers were gone. Some prospective buyers remained in the room for over an hour exploring the contents of the stolen CIA computers, before deciding on a purchase. I checked with the CIA and found that no CIA vetting of those buyers had occurred. Most did not have security clearances. Some of them had prior felony convictions and had been allowed into the White House ‘on orders from above’. The sale was ‘by invitation only’, with Bush and Cheney controlling the invitation list.

The earlier tape shows Cheney directing Halliburton employees in where to set the computers up. Much care and time was taken to plug them in and connect them to monitors, mice, keyboards, and to arrange the room nicely with a mouse pad under each mouse. The GAO has a copy of that tape too. The manual on how to torture people (in the manner described) and the file of CIA Personnel was sent overseas and domestically through the mail whenever a buyer purchased a snuff film from that man. His poorly kept records showed that he had mailed out at least 2,000 such CDs with the Manual on ‘How to please the Lords of Darkness’.

His records omitted the addresses that he sent them to in about 50% of the cases where he marked payment received and product and ‘How-to’ sent. Thirty of the murders had been solved already by local foreign authorities by the time I was given the case. Of those, the ‘How-to’ CD was found in 28 of them. Presumably it had been overlooked in the other two, or the wrong party may have been charged, or the ‘How-to’ thrown out by the ‘Black’ criminal operative.

Unfortunately, the murders had continued after those arrests.

BUSH AND CHENEY RESPONSIBLE FOR 168 CIA DEATHS, COVERED UP (HITHERTO) At least 168 CIA officers and their family members were brutally tortured to death as a direct result of this cynical corruption run by Bush and Cheney. The CIA [systematically] covered it all up and pretended that it never happened on Tenet’s orders. The notorious traitor Aldrich Ames had not sent out instructions to torture and kill anyone. He had sold ONE copy of a list of CIA operatives in one country to one buyer. He is languishing in prison for life.

[The perpetrator identified here] sent out over 2,000 copies of all the names and addresses of the CIA officers and their families in every country. He had sent them out with hate propaganda and incited others to kill them. He had sent this [Nazi filth] to people who were known murderers who had a commitment to kill again. And he had sent it out as a challenge: are you man enough to kill a CIA person? His group offered ‘Advanced Membership Privileges’ to anyone who succeeded.

It was very curious that someone close and high up in the investigations at the CIA was tipping him off, since he was targeting CIA officers. I was able to supply the GAO with the evidence as to who was doing it. This person was getting calls and faxes directly from Cheney and Tenet. Tenet’s faxes included the names of the victims to date. He was being assisted in his cover-up at a very high US level. I investigated whether the Russians or another foreign group had put him up to this, as his methods seemed too effective to be that of an individual’ alone.

HALLIBURTON LINKED TO THESE MURDERS OF CIA PERSONNEL I found no such evidence of a foreign government or its operatives being behind it [but] I found many ties to US underworld organizations. Most of the ties, however, were directly to Halliburton. According to Halliburton’s records which I sent the GAO, [the perpetrator of these incitements to murder CIA personnel] had headed one of their subsidiaries before it went bankrupt.

CIA INVESTIGATOR TOLD TO ‘BACK OFF, OR ELSE’ When I looked up that old corporation I did not find a building on the aerial to correspond to the address. That subsidiary had been selling intelligence and paramilitary gear. It had specialized in recruiting mercenaries worldwide. It made me wonder if those killing the CIA had done so, as a kind of recruitment test; those getting away with it and being able to prove it, getting the job. I started looking into whether he was on Halliburton’s books as CEO of a new subsidiary. Just as soon as I started that investigation, Cheney called and told me to ‘back off or else’.

I asked him what the ‘else’ referred to, because it certainly sounded like a death threat to me. He hung up on me. Then he called me back about 10 minutes later and offered to set up a face-to-face meeting with that computer owner. I agreed and asked at once for a time and a place. He hung up: apparently his offer was just to threaten me that he would [impose] that man on me. I sent copies of those calls to the GAO also. They should still have them. The Halliburton mercenary recruiter [who incited the murders] was never prosecuted. Cheney and Bush would not allow it.

BIO-FEEDBACK EQUIPMENT STOLEN BY HALLIBURTON FOR THE RUSSIANS In about May 2002, a Halliburton person at the CIA had stolen an expensive piece of equipment. It was an ultra-sophisticated CIA bio-feedback machine that was worth over $5 million.

It had required hundreds of millions of dollars of R & D money for the CIA to develop it. It was custom-made only for the CIA. Its only purpose was to train operatives how to pass a lie detector test. It was only used when they were to be sent on extremely dangerous missions to places like Russia. And it was only used in very critical missions.

There was a high risk that Russian intelligence would figure out how to overcome that training, if they interrogated about five operatives who had used it. That is, if they realised that those 5 had been trained in that fashion. Thus it was TOP SECRET and its manual was also top secret at the time. Loss of that machine and its Manual was the same as potentially losing every secret a given CIA official had in his or her mind when they were in Russia. The head of the CIA station in Russia had been trained on that machine for obvious reasons.

The effect of the training was to give the user control over their automatic nervous system. That meant that they could stop their fear, their sweating, their heart rate increase etc. in response to an interrogation. In addition to those obvious advantages in an interrogation situation, it had a big psychological benefit. It gave those who had used it confidence that they could pass a lie detector test. Thus, they were as if ‘bullet proofed’ against threats and lie detector tests.

Although the signal-to-noise ratio relating to information obtained under torture is so low as to be unusable, that is not true in a ‘friendly’ interrogation. The British had admirably demonstrated the effectiveness of ‘friendly interrogations’ in WWII. An operative who had fear or fear of a lie detector test was more likely to ‘tell all’ in a ‘friendly interrogation’ because of underlying anxiety. I did not find out about that theft until the next day. I then learned from a Halliburton person that it had been stolen and was en route to the Russian Embassy to be sold to them. I was absolutely horrified by the national security implications of that. I rushed up to Tenet’s office to tell him. He already knew.

Cheney had called him and asked him what it was and what it was worth to the Russians. This was after I had set up the system for things to go through Alan so that the oversight committee could intervene to stop the worst violations of national security.

But the thief was a personal friend of Cheney’s and had taken the item straight to the White House to ask him if he wanted to buy it. Cheney had paid him $50,000 for it, he informed me. The copy of the telephone call that I sent to the GAO between Tenet and Cheney showed that Mr Cheney had considered keeping it, so that he could pass lie detector tests.

CHENEY THREATENS TO KILL THE VETERAN CIA OPERATIVE PERSONALLY They had discussed it and Tenet had promised to find out more about it, how it worked, and how much it was ‘worth outside of the CIA’. He had called him back and told him a figure of $1.2 million. Cheney asked him to find out what was his risk of needing the machine himself. Tenet called him back and said that CIA analysts judged his risk to be about 4%. In front of Tenet with his phone on speaker, I called Cheney and demanded its return.

He laughed and said, ‘What’s the big deal? It can only be used 5 times total and it has already been used once. We should sell it while it still has value before those 5 times are up’. He had absolutely no understanding of intelligence matters. It was not 5 uses of the machine: it was 5 times a CIA person trained using that machine was interrogated by the Russians. It could be 20 years’ worth of use to prevent the loss of security codes, national secrets, and how a CIA station was operating.

I explained it all quite carefully as Cheney is not a technically minded person. I even asked him questions to make certain that he had understood what I said correctly [Editor: This interesting comment suggests that Cheney is actually not that bright, which may also be judged to be the case, given his behaviour over the Settlements and his repeated thefts of gigantic sums of money. It may be that he progressed to these much larger thefts after getting away with multiple lesser thefts of which examples have been given in this narrative]. Cheney then said: ‘Well, what difference does it make since there are remote viewers like you in Russia who can steal the secrets anyway?’

I then explained that remote viewers were not 100% accurate and that intelligence agencies always had to verify what they said using hard data. Lie detector tests are not 100% accurate either, but they add some signal-to-noise benefit. Mr Cheney replied that torture was generally worthless in getting information [Editor: Amazing! Was not Cheney reported to be adamant that torture MUST be used to extract intelligence from terrorists and from prisoners in US hell holes like Gantanamo and Abu Ghraib?]. That was true. But it was still wrong to sell the Russians the CIA’s very best and most advanced equipment to deter loss of information under interrogation. ‘Friendly interrogations’ do yield valid intelligence.

When I pointed that out, Cheney said that the machine had already been sold to the Russians and that I was too late. I told him that I would figure out some way of prosecuting him, if he ever did that again. He laughed and said, ‘You haven’t got a chance’. I told him that I would try.

Cheney then said: ‘I will kill you myself, if you ever get close to succeeding’.

As we have said before, Cheney is what Malachi Martin would have called ‘perfectly possessed’.

RUSSIA TREATED AS ‘THE ENEMY’ THROUGHOUT: RAPPROCHEMENT IS THEREFORE FALSE You will have noticed that during the timeframe of this narrative [2002-2005-ish], Russia is considered in this dialogue to be an enemy, just as was the case during the overt Cold War.

This reflects the fact that the dialectical breach created by Lenin’s Revolution and its aftermath has not, in fact, been healed or discarded: exactly as the Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn advised the disinterested CIA: see The Perestroika Deception by Anatoliy Golitsyn, edited by Christopher Story, available from the books [Edward Harle Limited] segment of this website.
ADD-ONS AND UPDATES ORIGINALLY APPENDED AT THE TOP OF THIS REPORT:
• NEW: LETTER FROM VIENNA: BULLSEYE PERSPECTIVES ON THE GERMAN CRISIS: SPEECHES IN THE BUNDESTAG LAMENT THE IMMINENT FAILURE OF THE PAN-GERMAN PROJECT TO CONTROL EUROPE: THEY COULDN’T CARE LESS ABOUT THE PLIGHT OF THE FAILING SATRAP E.U. STATES. ALL THEY CARE ABOUT IS THE FACT THAT THEIR PROJECT IS COLLAPSING, NOCH EINMAL: LIKE EVERY PREVIOUS ATTEMPT THEY HAVE MADE TO TAKE OVER AND CONTROL EUROPE. THE PAN-GERMANS (DVD) ARE A MENACE TO EUROPEAN AND GLOBAL STABILITY. SEE THIS ADD-0N TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION CORRUPTION SECTION, WHICH FOLLOWS THE UPDATES IMMEDIATELY BELOW.

• BEFORE WE START: YOUNGEST SON OF LAWYER JOHN HEMENWAY, WHO BROUGHT A QUO WARRANTO ACTION AGAINST OBAMA, WAS SHOT DEAD IN BEDFORD, VIRGINIA ON 30TH APRIL. THE U.S. CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT’S CONTROLLING INTELLIGENCE POWER IS PREPARED EVEN TO LIE ITS WAY OUT OF THIS ASSASSINATION. MEMORIAL DETAILS ARE GIVEN BELOW.

The first information that we published about this shooting was as follows [3rd May 2010]:

The Editor has just received the following flash information from an impeccable US source whom he has known personally for the best part of two decades:

‘I just heard that John Hemenway’s younger son, also named John, was shot to death outside Bedford, Virginia. John Hemenway is the attorney who filed the Quo Warranto lawsuit against Obama. I just got off the phone and there’s an autopsy going on…’.

The Editor writes: We were originally advised that the Memorial is on 5th May, but this information has been updated: it’s on the 4th. We are in touch with parties quite close to the family and as the matter is so extremely sensitive, we are holding back on further details until we can obtain the go-ahead, if that is granted. In the meantime, here’s the Memorial announcement:

HEMENWAY JOHN MARTIN HEMENWAY (Age 47) On April 30, 2010 of Bedford, VA. Beloved husband of 7 years to Stephanie; loving father of Andrew Branham Hemenway; devoted son of John and Betty Hemenway; beloved brother of Catherine and Edward Siewick, Jane and John Sullivan, David and Margaret Hemenway and Fielding Williams. Pre-deceased by his beloved sister Mary Joyce Hemenway Williams. Also survived by many loving nieces, nephews, relatives and friends.

Memorial Service on Tuesday, May 4, at 4:30 p.m. at Otterville United Methodist Church, Bedford, VA. In lieu of flowers memorials may be made to the John M. Hemenway Camp CHILD Scholarship for special needs children c/o Bedford Primary School, 807 College Street, Bedford, VA 24523.

• NOTE: Late on Monday 3rd May 2010, the link count for our report ‘ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID’ reached 33,700, after being frozen at 27,500 for days.

• UPDATE: WAXMAN’S HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE PUTS HALLIBURTON IN THE FIRING LINE WITH RESPECT TO (OUR) SUSPICIONS CONCERNING THE FAULTY CEMENTING PROCESS. SEE BELOW FOR THE TEXT OF MR HENRY A. WAXMAN’S LETTER TO MR DAVID J. LESAR, C.E.O. OF HALLIBURTON CO., DATED 30TH APRIL 2010, DEMANDING ALL DOCUMENTS.
• UPDATE: HALLIBURTON HAD ONLY JUST FINISHED A CEMENTING JOB ON THE OIL RIG: READ THIS AND THEN READ WHAT WE SAID BELOW BEFORE THIS DATA BECAME AVAILABLE: Although no cause has been determined, oil services contractor Halliburton Inc. says it finished a cementing operation 20 hours before a Gulf of Mexico rig went up in flames.

Halliburton is named as a defendant in most of the more than two dozen lawsuits filed by Gulf Coast people and businesses claiming the huge oil spill could ruin them financially. In one lawsuit, two Louisiana shrimpers claim cementing contributed to the explosion.

Halliburton said Friday [30th April 2010] it had four workers stationed on the rig, performing several tasks, including cementing, a process of applying cement and water to a pipe used to prevent the wall of the hole from caving in during drilling.

According to a 2007 study by Minerals Management Service, cementing was a factor in 18 of 39 rig blowouts in the Gulf between 1992 and 2006. San Francisco Chronicle:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/04/30/financi…

See also The Wall Street Journal:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575214593564769072.html

* PLUS: Halliburton buys Oil Fire Fighting company on April 12th for $240 Million

In 1978, Edward “Coots” Matthews and Asger “Boots” Hansen founded Boots & Coots (WEL). Both were veteran oil-well firefighters. But the days of independence have come to an end for Boots & Coots as the company has agreed to sell out to Halliburton (HAL) for $240.4 million. Shareholders will get $1.73 in cash and $1.27 in Halliburton stock for every share of Boots & Coots.
• SO, IT WASN’T PREMEDITATED SABOTAGE TO SPITE THE BRITS, GIVEN WHAT’S BEEN GOING ON FINANCIALLY BEHIND THE SCENES AS THE CRIMINALS ARE BEING FACED DOWN? ASK CHENEY…. And read all about Halliburton’s scamming of the CIA and the Pentagon, and the national security breaches committed by Halliburton in the process, under Cheney’s watch, below.
• WAXMAN’S HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE PUTS HALLIBURTON IN THE FIRING LINE WITH RESPECT TO (OUR) SUSPICIONS CONCERNING THE FAULTY CEMENTING PROCESS. SEE BELOW FOR THE TEXT OF MR HENRY A. WAXMAN’S LETTER TO MR DAVID J. LESAR, C.E.O. OF HALLIBURTON CO., DATED 30TH APRIL 2010, DEMANDING ALL DOCUMENTS.

HENRY A. WAXMAN, CALIFORNIA, CHAIRMAN JOE BARTON, TEXAS, RANKING MEMBER COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE Congress of the United States House of Representatives
2125 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515-6115

Majority: (202) 225 2927 Minority: (202) 225 3641

April 30, 2010-05-04

Mr David J. Lesar Halliburton Co. US Corporate Headquarters
3000 North Sam Houston Parkway East Houston, Texas 77032

Dear Mr Lesar

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal today, one possible cause of the explosion that destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and led to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico could be a problem with the cementing that was supposed to seal the well. In this procedure, cement is used to plug the well and to fill gaps between the well pipe and the hole drilled into the ocean floor in order to prevent combustible oil and gas from escaping. Problems with the cementing process have frequently been identified as causes of oil well blowouts. The article quoted one independent expert who said: “The initial likely cause of gas coming to the surface had something to do with the cement” (1). Halliburton Co. provided cementing services for the Deepwater Horizon rig.

As part of the Committee’s investigation into the cause of the oil spill, we ask that you take three steps. First, we request that you arrange a briefing on May 5, 2010, for Committee staff with Halliburton officials knowledgeable about Halliburton’s cementing activities at the Deepwater Horizon rig.

Second, we ask you to provide the Committee with all documents in Halliburton’s possession relating to (1) the explosion at the Deepwater Horizon rig; (2) the possibility or risk of an explosion or blowout at the Deepwater Horizon rig; and (3) the status, adequacy, quality, monitoring, and inspection of the cementing work relating to the Deepwater Horizon rig. We request that you provide these documents on May 7, 2010. An attachment to this letter provides additional information on how to respond to Committee document requests.

Third, we ask that you preserve for potential future production to the Committee all documents relating to Halliburton’s operations at and involvement with the Deepwater Horizon rig.

We appreciate your assistance with the Committee’s investigation. We believe it is essential that the spill and its causes are thoroughly investigated. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Meredith Fuchs of the Committee staff at (202) 226-2424.

Sincerely,

[Signed] Henry A. Waxman, Chairman

[Signed] Bart Stupak Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

Enclosure.

cc. The Honorable Joe Barton, Ranking Member The Honorable Michael Burgess, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

(1) Drilling Process Attracts Scrutiny in Rig Explosion, The Wall Street Journal, April 30, 2010.
• Note: The oil rig issue and Halliburton’s scamming operations follow our exposure of parallel institutionalised corruption at the European Commission, subject of the Editor’s speech.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

.

to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
Advertisements

Posted in Christopher STORY, Edward Harle, Global Reports, IN MEMORIAM - Christopher STORY, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »